Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9404370›Full record

Trial reportThorax1997

Pharmacokinetics and extrapulmonary beta 2 adrenoceptor activity of nebulised racemic salbutamol and its R and S isomers in healthy volunteers.

B J Lipworth, D J Clark, P Koch, C Arbeeny

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Levalbuterol versus albuterol.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2009
    Article
  5. Single-isomer levalbuterol: a review of the acute data.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2003
    Review
  6. Methods to identify drug deposition in the lungs following inhalation.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2001
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B J LipworthDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
D J Clark
P Koch
C Arbeeny
Ninewells Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacemic salbutamol remains one of the most commonly used bronchodilators in the treatment of reversible airways obstruction. Data from animal and human studies suggest that the S-isomer, whilst contributing no bronchodilator activity, may induce increased bronchial hyperreactivity and may explain the adverse effects of regular racemic salbutamol on asthmatic disease control. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose-response effects of racemic (+/-) salbutamol and its R(-) and S(+) isomers in terms of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics at extrapulmonary beta 2 adrenoceptors when given by the inhaled route to healthy volunteers.

methodsTwelve healthy volunteers of mean age 20.6 years were studied in a double blind, placebo controlled, crossover design comparing cumulative doubling doses of nebulised R-salbutamol (R) and S-salbutamol (S) isomers (200 micrograms/400 micrograms/800 micrograms/1600 micrograms/3200 micrograms) and racemic salbutamol (RS) (400 micrograms/800 micrograms/1600 micrograms/3200 micrograms/6400 micrograms). Doses were administered at 20 minute intervals (t0/t20/t40/t60/t80) and measurements were made of extrapulmonary beta 2 responses as an increase in finger tremor and heart rate and fall in plasma potassium at baseline and each dose level (t0/t20/t40/t60/t80/t100). Plasma levels of salbutamol were measured at 15 minutes after each dose with a further sample at 30 minutes after the last dose (t110).

resultsPharmacodynamics showed dose related beta 2 responses for R-salbutamol and RS-salbutamol but not for the S isomer, and a plateau in response was not reached within the administered dose range. No differences in responses were found between R-salbutamol and RS-salbutamol when compared on a 1:2 microgram basis. The effects of the S isomer were indistinguishable from those of placebo. For all beta 2 responses there were differences between R-salbutamol and S-salbutamol (for t100 response as change from placebo); tremor (log units): R 0.74 vs S 0.03 (95% CI 0.39 to 1.03); fall in potassium (mmol/ 1): R 0.35 vs S -0.02 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.71). Pharmacokinetics showed consistently higher levels for S-salbutamol than R-salbutamol at 15 minutes after each dose, with R-salbutamol already being cleared and S-salbutamol reaching peak levels at 30 minutes after the last dose (at t110). There were higher plasma levels of R-salbutamol and S-salbutamol following administration of the respective isomers alone compared with their levels after administration of the racemate, suggesting an influence of each isomer on the clearance of the opposite isomer when given as a racemate.

conclusionsThe S-isomer of salbutamol has no detectable activity at extrapulmonary beta 2 adrenoceptors whilst exhibiting higher plasma levels than the R-isomer, in keeping with greater clearance of R-salbutamol than S-salbutamol. Inhalation of R-salbutamol and RS-salbutamol produced dose-related beta 2 responses which were equivalent when compared on a 1:2 microgram basis, despite higher plasma levels of R-salbutamol after administration of the R isomer than after administration of the racemate. Further dose ranging studies are required at steady state to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of R- and S-salbutamol and their relative effects on bronchial hyperreactivity when given on a regular basis to asthmatic subjects.

Indexed as

AdultAlbuterolBronchodilator AgentsCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodHeart RateHumansPotassiumReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2StereoisomerismTremorAlbuterolBronchodilator AgentsPotassiumReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2

Identifiers

PMID9404370
PMCPMC1758434
OpenAlexW2119291730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.