Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9403731›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology1997

Accumulation of genetic changes is associated with poor prognosis in grade II astrocytomas.

S L Sallinen, P Sallinen, H Haapasalo, J Kononen, R Karhu, P Helén, J Isola

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S L SallinenDepartment of Pathology, Tampere University Hospital, University of Tampere, Finland. losasa@uta.fi
P Sallinen
H Haapasalo
J Kononen
R Karhu
P Helén
J Isola
Tampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unexpectedly aggressive clinical course of some grade II astrocytomas is a diagnostic dilemma for routine histopathology. Because increasing tumor malignancy is a consequence of progressive accumulation of chromosomal alterations, we investigated whether aggressive behavior of grade II astrocytomas could be predicted by the number and type of gross chromosomal aberrations. We used comparative genomic hybridization to analyze 11 grade II astrocytomas with typical (good, n = 7) or poor (n = 4) prognosis. The results were also compared with a reference material of 13 grade III-IV astrocytomas and nine established cell lines. We found a median of two aberrations (range 0 to 4) in tumors with good prognosis and of 15.5 changes (range 8 to 28) in tumors with poor prognosis. Chromosomal gains were present in both groups, whereas chromosomal losses were frequent in tumors with poor prognosis (median 9.5, range 3 to 14) but rare in tumors with good prognosis (range 0 to 2). All chromosomal gains were also found in the high-grade astrocytoma group and the majority of them in cell lines. Chromosomal losses in grade II astrocytomas with poor prognosis were very similar to those in grade III-IV astrocytomas and cell lines. We conclude that an early accumulation of genetic changes in grade II astrocytomas is closely associated with poor patient prognosis, suggesting diagnostic use for comparative genomic hybridization in characterization of grade II astrocytomas.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAdolescentAdultAstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsChild, PreschoolChromosome MappingDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGenome, HumanHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNucleic Acid HybridizationPrognosisDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID9403731
PMCPMC1858343
OpenAlexW40510485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.