Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9399948›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation1997

An increased prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus infection in young patients suggests a possible etiology for systemic lupus erythematosus.

J A James, K M Kaufman, A D Farris, E Taylor-Albert, T J Lehman, J B Harley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 513 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Multiple molecular mimics in Epstein Barr Nuclear Antigen-1, and the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A case of lupus nephritis in an art student.Clinical nephrology. Case studies · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Multiple sclerosis and infection: history, EBV, and the search for mechanism.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J A JamesDepartment of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, USA.
K M Kaufman
A D Farris
E Taylor-Albert
T J Lehman
J B Harley
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · USHospital for Special Surgery · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

GENETIC ASSOCIATION WITH LUPUS IN AMERICAN BLACKSR01AR042460 · NIAMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI HARLEY, JOHN BARKER · 1993 to 2009
$5.1M
PEPTIDES INDUCE LUPUS AUTOIMMUNITYR01AR042474 · NIAMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GRAY-MCGUIRE, COURTNEY · 1993 to 1997
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI424717NIAMS NIH HHS AR42460NIAMS NIH HHS AR42474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An unknown environmental agent has been suspected to induce systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus) in man. Prompted by our recent immunochemical findings, we sought evidence for an association between Epstein-Barr virus infection and lupus. Because the vast majority of adults have been infected with Epstein-Barr virus, we chose to study children and young adults. Virtually all (116 of 117, or 99%) of these young patients had seroconverted against Epstein-Barr virus, as compared with only 70% (107 of 153) of their controls (odds ratio 49.9, 95% confidence interval 9.3-1025, P < 0. 00000000001). The difference in the rate of Epstein-Barr virus seroconversion could not be explained by serum IgG level or by cross-reacting anti-Sm/nRNP autoantibodies. No similar difference was found in the seroconversion rates against four other herpes viruses. An assay for Epstein-Barr viral DNA in peripheral blood lymphocytes established Epstein-Barr virus infection in the peripheral blood of all 32 of the lupus patients tested, while only 23 of the 32 matched controls were infected (odds ratio > 10, 95% confidence interval 2.53-infinity, P < 0.002). When considered with other evidence supporting a relationship between Epstein-Barr virus and lupus, these data are consistent with, but do not in themselves establish, Epstein-Barr virus infection as an etiologic factor in lupus.

Indexed as

Capsid ProteinsHerpesvirus 4, HumanAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralChildChild, PreschoolDNA, ViralHerpesviridae InfectionsHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicPrevalenceTumor Virus InfectionsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsDNA, ViralEpstein-Barr viral capsid antigen

Identifiers

PMID9399948
PMCPMC508514
OpenAlexW2020689018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.