Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9399496›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1997

Multicenter study using standardized protocols and reagents for evaluation of reproducibility of PCR-based fingerprinting of Acinetobacter spp.

H J Grundmann, K J Towner, L Dijkshoorn, P Gerner-Smidt, M Maher, H Seifert, M Vaneechoutte

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic Diversity of theMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  2. Diversification ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Concurrence of Inactivation Enzyme-Encoding GenesFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Prevalence of Carbapenem Resistance Genes amongAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Co-existence ofAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Carbapenem resistance and acquired class D beta-lactamases in Acinetobacter baumannii from Croatia 2009-2010.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Persistence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains in the host for long periods of time: relationship between phylogenetic groups and virulence factors.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

H J GrundmannInstitute for Environmental Medicine and Hospital Hygiene, University of Freiburg, Germany.
K J Towner
L Dijkshoorn
P Gerner-Smidt
M Maher
H Seifert
M Vaneechoutte

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seven laboratories in six European countries examined 40 isolates belonging to the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex to investigate whether standardized protocols and quality-controlled reagents could produce reliable, discriminatory, and reproducible PCR-based fingerprinting results. Four PCR protocols with different primers (primers DAF4, ERIC-2, M13, and REP1 + REP2) were used. The epidemiological conclusions reached by the participating laboratories were substantially correct, with 96.4% of the total isolate grouping allocations agreeing with the consensus view. All laboratories identified the main epidemiological clusters, and each laboratory also identified two non-outbreak-related isolates. There were no significant differences between the isolate grouping results obtained by the different protocols and with the different primers. Visual comparison indicated that the standardized protocols and reagents yielded reproducible fingerprint patterns, but with some variations in particular band intensities. Minor variations in fingerprint profiles were detected, but computer-assisted analysis of PCR fingerprints obtained on agarose gels demonstrated that 88.3 to 91.6% (depending on the source of DNA) of the patterns clustered correctly, while 96.4 to 98.9% of the patterns clustered correctly following automated high-resolution laser fluorescence analysis. Correlation of the patterns for isogenic isolates ranged from 83.3 to 86.6% but was slightly better (mean correlation, 87.1%) for centrally prepared DNA extracts than for DNA extracts prepared by individual laboratories (mean correlation, 84.7%). It was concluded that independently produced PCR fingerprint patterns can be obtained reproducibly for Acinetobacter spp. at the practical level if (i) quality-controlled reagents, (ii) standardized extraction of DNA, and (iii) standardized amplification conditions are used.

Indexed as

AcinetobacterAcinetobacter InfectionsBase SequenceCross InfectionDisease OutbreaksDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingDNA PrimersEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansIndicators and ReagentsMolecular EpidemiologyPolymerase Chain ReactionQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersIndicators and Reagents

Identifiers

PMID9399496
PMCPMC230124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.