Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9393714›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology1997

Negative regulation of mutS and mutH repair gene expression by the Hfq and RpoS global regulators of Escherichia coli K-12.

H C Tsui, G Feng, M E Winkler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 214 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Regulation of the Expression ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H C TsuiDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Houston Medical School, 77030-1501, USA.
G Feng
M E Winkler
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MutS, MutL, and MutH proteins play major roles in several DNA repair pathways. We previously reported that the cellular amounts of MutS and MutH decreased by as much as 10-fold in stationary-phase cultures. Consequently, we tested whether the amounts of MutS, MutL, and MutH were regulated by two global regulators, RpoS (sigma38) and Hfq (HF-I [putative RNA chaperone]), which are involved in stationary-phase transition. We report here that mutations in hfq and rpoS reversed the stationary-phase down-regulation of the amounts of MutS and MutH. hfq regulation of the amount of MutS in stationary-phase cultures was mediated by RpoS-dependent and -independent mechanisms, whereas hfq regulation of the amount of MutH was mediated only through RpoS. Consistent with this interpretation, the amount of MutS but not MutH was regulated by Hfq, but not RpoS, in exponentially growing cells. The amount of MutL remained unchanged in rpoS, hfq-1, and rpoS+, hfq+ strains in exponentially growing and stationary-phase cultures and served as a control. The beta-galactosidase activities of single-copy mutS-lacZ operon and gene fusions suggested that hfq regulates mutS posttranscriptionally in exponentially growing cultures. RNase T2 protection assays revealed increased amounts of mutS transcript that are attributed to increased mutS transcript stability in hfq-1 mutants. Lack of Hfq also increased the amounts and stabilities of transcripts initiated from P(miaA) and P1hfqHS, two of the promoters for hfq, suggesting autoregulation, but did not change the half-life of bulk mRNA. These results suggest that the amounts of MutS and MutH may be adjusted in cells subjected to different stress conditions by an RpoS-dependent mechanism. In addition, Hfq directly or indirectly regulates several genes, including mutS, hfq, and miaA, by an RpoS-independent mechanism that destabilizes transcripts.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesDNA Repair EnzymesEscherichia coli ProteinsAlkyl and Aryl TransferasesBacterial ProteinsCarrier ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA RepairDown-RegulationEndodeoxyribonucleasesEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, BacterialHalf-LifeHost Factor 1 ProteinIntegration Host FactorsAdenosine Triphosphatasesadenylate isopentenyltransferaseAlkyl and Aryl TransferasesBacterial ProteinsCarrier ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesEndodeoxyribonucleasesEscherichia coli ProteinsHost Factor 1 Proteinintegration host factor, E coliIntegration Host Factorsmethyl-directed mismatch repair protein, E coliMolecular ChaperonesMutS DNA Mismatch-Binding ProteinMutS protein, E coliRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRNA, BacterialRNA, MessengerRNA PrecursorsSigma Factorsigma factor KatF protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID9393714
PMCPMC179700
OpenAlexW2120492372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.