Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9391147›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1997

On the spurious endoproteolytic processing of the presenilin proteins in cultured cells and tissues.

N N Dewji, C Do, S J Singer

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Presenilin-1 regulates the neuronal threshold to excitotoxicity both physiologically and pathologically.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Additional evidence for an eight-transmembrane-domain topology for Caenorhabditis elegans and human presenilins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N N DewjiDepartment of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0322, USA.
C Do
S J Singer
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

NINDS NIH HHS 2RO1-NS27850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been widely reported that the presenilin proteins PS-1 and PS-2 in extracts derived from a variety of cultured cells and from tissues are fragmented extensively by endoproteolytic processing events. It generally has been presumed that this endoproteolysis is a physiologically normal intracellular event following presenilin expression, which might play an important role in the still unknown functions of these molecules in connection with Alzheimer disease. We demonstrate herein, however, that, if a variety of cultured cells and several mouse tissues are examined under conditions minimizing cell trauma, the presenilin molecules in the extracts are found to be intact but that, if the cells and tissues are prepared under somewhat more stressful conditions, the endoproteolytic fragments are then observed. We conclude that these particular endoproteolytic events are not the result of physiologically normal processing of the presenilins but are rather artifacts occurring during the common procedures of specimen preparation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnimalsAntibody SpecificityBrainCell LineEndopeptidasesHumansKidneyLiverMembrane ProteinsMicePeptide FragmentsPresenilin-1Presenilin-2Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalRabbitsEndopeptidasesMembrane ProteinsPeptide FragmentsPresenilin-1Presenilin-2PSEN1 protein, humanPSEN2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID9391147
PMCPMC28427
OpenAlexW2001753593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.