Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9382110›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1997

Deletion of all CGG repeats plus flanking sequences in FMR1 does not abolish gene expression.

K Grønskov, H Hjalgrim, M O Bjerager, K Brøndum-Nielsen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In Utero Alcohol and Unsuitable Home Environmental Exposure Combined withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Size and methylation mosaicism in males with Fragile X syndrome.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nucleosomal occupancy and CGG repeat expansion: a comparative analysis of triplet repeat region from mouse and human fragile X mental retardation gene 1.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  13. A nonsense mutation in FMR1 causing fragile X syndrome.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2011
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Chromosomal fragility and human genetic disorders.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2000
    Article
  19. The fragile X syndrome.Journal of medical genetics · 1998
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K GrønskovDepartment of Medical Genetics, John F. Kennedy Institute, Glostrup, Denmark.
H Hjalgrim
M O Bjerager
K Brøndum-Nielsen
Kennedy Center · DKUniversity College Capital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fragile X syndrome is due to the new class of dynamic mutations. It is associated with an expansion of a trinucleotide repeat (CGG) in exon 1 of the fragile X mental retardation gene 1 gene (FMR1). Here we present a fragile X family with an unique female patient who was rendered hemizygous for the FRAXA locus due to a large deletion of one X chromosome. In addition, the other X had a microdeletion in FMR1. PCR and sequence analysis revealed that the microdeletion included all CGG repeats plus 97 bp of flanking sequences, leaving transcription start site and translation start site intact. Despite this total lack of CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene, Western blot analysis showed expression of FMRP, and the patient's phenotype was essentially normal. X-inactivation studies of the androgen-receptor (AR) locus and haplotype determination of microsatellite markers gave evidence that the deletion probably originated from regression of a fully mutated FMR1 gene. Although the minimal number of CGG repeats hitherto reported in FRAXA is six, and at least four other genes associated with CGG repeats are known, suggesting an as yet unknown function of these repeats, our study clearly demonstrates that the absence of CGG repeats does not abolish expression of the FMR1 gene in lymphoblastoid cells.

Indexed as

RNA-Binding ProteinsSequence DeletionTrinucleotide RepeatsX ChromosomeAdultBase SequenceFemaleFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic MarkersHumansMaleMolecular Sequence DataNerve Tissue ProteinsPedigreeFMR1 protein, humanFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Genetic MarkersNerve Tissue ProteinsRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID9382110
PMCPMC1716002
OpenAlexW2074053990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.