Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9379410›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology1997

Identification of regions that regulate the expression and activity of G protein-gated inward rectifier K+ channels in Xenopus oocytes.

E B Stevens, R Woodward, I H Ho, R Murrell-Lagnado

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Relevance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Neuronal G protein-gated KAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Structural elements in the Girk1 subunit that potentiate G protein-gated potassium channel activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E B StevensDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, UK.
R Woodward
I H Ho
R Murrell-Lagnado
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The involvement of the cytoplasmic and core regions of K+ channel Kir3.1 and Kir3.2 subunits in determining the cell surface expression and G protein-gated activity of homomeric and heteromeric channel complexes was investigated by heterologous expression of chimeric and wild-type subunits together with the m2 muscarinic receptor in Xenopus oocytes. 2. Co-expression of Kir3.1 and Kir3.2 subunits yielded currents severalfold larger than those elicited by the individual expression of these subunits. Immunofluorescence labelling indicated that Kir3.2 homomeric channels and Kir3.1-Kir3.2 heteromeric channels were expressed at high levels at the cell surface whereas Kir3.1 homomeric complexes were not expressed at the cell surface. Chimeric subunits composed of Kir3.1 and Kir3.2 showed that the presence of either the cytoplasmic tails or the core region of Kir3.1 in all subunits inhibits expression of channels at the plasma membrane. 3. Substituting the cytoplasmic tails of Kir3.1 for the cytoplasmic tails of Kir3.2, generated a chimeric subunit (121) which displayed dramatically increased acetylcholine-induced channel activity compared with the wild-type Kir3.2 homomeric channel. Cell-attached, single-channel recordings revealed that chimera 121 channel openings were longer than Kir3.2 openings. 4. Individually substituting the N- and C-terminal tails of Kir3.1 for those of Kir3.2 showed that the C-terminal tail of Kir3.1 enhanced the activity of heteromeric channels independently of the N-terminal or core regions of this subunit. 5. The chimeric channel, 121, displayed a higher ratio of ACh-induced to basal activity than the Kir3.1-Kir3.2 or Kir3.2 channels. A smaller proportion of chimera 121 channels appear to be activated by the basal turnover of G proteins, implying that they have a lower affinity for G beta gamma. Our results suggest that substituting the Kir3.1 C-terminal tail for the Kir3.2 tail promotes the opening conformational change of the G beta gamma-bound channel. 6. The core and C-terminal regions of Kir3.1 independently conferred time dependence on voltage-dependent activation. The time constant (tau) was between 5 and 10 ms and varied little over the voltage range -60 to -120 mV.

Indexed as

Potassium Channels, Inwardly RectifyingAnimalsDNA, ComplementaryElectrophysiologyFemaleGTP-Binding ProteinsIon Channel GatingKineticsMicroinjectionsMutagenesisOocytesPatch-Clamp TechniquesPotassium ChannelsRabbitsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVirulence Factors, BordetellaDNA, ComplementaryGTP-Binding ProteinsKCNJ15 protein, humanKCNJ4 protein, humanPotassium ChannelsPotassium Channels, Inwardly RectifyingRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVirulence Factors, Bordetella

Identifiers

PMID9379410
PMCPMC1159840
OpenAlexW2040487409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.