Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9372931›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1997

Subunit composition determines E2F DNA-binding site specificity.

Y Tao, R F Kassatly, W D Cress, J M Horowitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. AMolecular and cellular biology · 2020
    Article
  7. CDK2 regulates the NRF1/The Journal of cell biology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CDK4 Amplification Reduces Sensitivity to CDK4/6 Inhibition in Fusion-Positive Rhabdomyosarcoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y TaoDepartment of Molecular Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
R F Kassatly
W D Cress
J M Horowitz
Duke Medical Center · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

RB PROTEIN--BIOCHEMICAL AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSISR01CA053248 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HOROWITZ, JONATHAN M · 1991 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS CA09111NCI NIH HHS CA53248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The product of the retinoblastoma (Rb) susceptibility gene, Rb-1, regulates the activity of a wide variety of transcription factors, such as E2F, in a cell cycle-dependent fashion. E2F is a heterodimeric transcription factor composed of two subunits each encoded by one of two related gene families, denoted E2F and DP. Five E2F genes, E2F-1 through E2F-5, and two DP genes, DP-1 and DP-2, have been isolated from mammals, and heterodimeric complexes of these proteins are expressed in most, if not all, vertebrate cells. It is not yet clear whether E2F/DP complexes regulate overlapping and/or specific cellular genes. Moreover, little is known about whether Rb regulates all or a subset of E2F-dependent genes. Using recombinant E2F, DP, and Rb proteins prepared in baculovirus-infected cells and a repetitive immunoprecipitation-PCR procedure (CASTing), we have identified consensus DNA-binding sites for E2F-1/DP-1, E2F-1/DP-2, E2F-4/DP-1, and E2F-4/DP-2 complexes as well as an Rb/E2F-1/DP-1 trimeric complex. Our data indicate that (i) E2F, DP, and Rb proteins each influence the selection of E2F-binding sites; (ii) E2F sites differ with respect to their intrinsic DNA-bending properties; (iii) E2F/DP complexes induce distinct degrees of DNA bending; and (iv) complex-specific E2F sites selected in vitro function distinctly as regulators of cell cycle-dependent transcription in vivo. These data indicate that the specific sequence of an E2F site may determine its role in transcriptional regulation and suggest that Rb/E2F complexes may regulate subsets of E2F-dependent cellular genes.

Indexed as

Carrier ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsAnimalsBaculoviridaeBase SequenceBinding SitesCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineConsensus SequenceCricetinaeDimerizationDNADNA PrimersE2F1 Transcription FactorE2F4 Transcription FactorE2F5 Transcription FactorCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersE2F1 protein, humanE2F1 Transcription FactorE2F4 protein, humanE2F4 Transcription FactorE2F5 Transcription FactorE2F Transcription FactorsRecombinant ProteinsRetinoblastoma-Binding Protein 1Retinoblastoma ProteinTFDP1 protein, humanTranscription Factor DP1Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID9372931
PMCPMC232556
OpenAlexW2164654743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.