Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9372928›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1997

Sin mutations of histone H3: influence on nucleosome core structure and function.

H Kurumizaka, A P Wolffe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Histone mutations in cancer.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Structural studies of functional nucleosome complexes with transacting factors.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Unwinding and rewinding the nucleosome inner turn: force dependence of the kinetic rate constants.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

H KurumizakaLaboratory of Molecular Embryology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-5431, USA.
A P Wolffe
National Institute of Child Health · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sin mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae alleviate transcriptional defects that result from the inactivation of the yeast SWVI/SNF complex. We have investigated the structural and functional consequences for the nucleosome of Sin mutations in histone H3. We directly test the hypothesis that mutations in histone H3 leading to a SWI/SNF-independent (Sin) phenotype in yeast lead to nucleosomal destabilization. In certain instances this is shown to be true; however, nucleosomal destabilization does not always occur. Topoisomerase I-mediated relaxation of minichromosomes assembled with either mutant histone H3 or wild-type H3 together with histones H2A, H2B, and H4 indicates that DNA is constrained into nucleosomal structures containing either mutant or wild-type proteins. However, nucleosomes containing particular mutant H3 molecules (R116-H and T118-I) are more accessible to digestion by micrococcal nuclease and do not constrain DNA in a precise rotational position, as revealed by digestion with DNase I. This result establishes that Sin mutations in histone H3 located close to the dyad axis can destabilize histone-DNA contacts at the periphery of the nucleosome core. Other nucleosomes containing a distinct mutant H3 molecule (E105-K) associated with a Sin phenotype show very little change in nucleosome structure and stability compared to wild-type nucleosomes. Both mutant and wild-type nucleosomes continue to restrict the binding of either TATA-binding protein/transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) or the RNA polymerase III transcription machinery. Thus, different Sin mutations in histone H3 alter the stability of histone-DNA interactions to various extents in the nucleosome while maintaining the fundamental architecture of the nucleosome and contributing to a common Sin phenotype.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsChickensChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalFungal ProteinsHistonesIn Vitro TechniquesNucleosomesPhenotypePlasmidsRecombinant ProteinsRNA Polymerase IIISaccharomyces cerevisiaeTATA-Box Binding ProteinChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalFungal ProteinsHistonesNucleosomesRecombinant ProteinsRNA Polymerase IIITATA-Box Binding ProteinTranscription FactorsTranscription Factor TFIIA

Identifiers

PMID9372928
PMCPMC232553
OpenAlexW2130217132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.