Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9372149›Full record

ArticleInvertebrate neuroscience : IN1996

Longitudinal body wall muscles are electrically coupled across the segmental boundary in the third instar larva of Drosophila melanogaster.

A Ueda, Y Kidokoro

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Invertebrate neuroscience : IN, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Electrophysiological recording in the Drosophila embryo.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2009
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Glutamate receptor expression regulates quantal size and quantal content at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1999
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A UedaGunma University School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Y Kidokoro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal body wall muscles in the third instar larva of the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster, were systematically examined for electrical and dye coupling. These muscle cells were found to be electrically coupled but rarely dye-coupled across the segmental boundary. The inter-segmental coupling coefficients between muscle #6s and muscle #7s across the segmental boundary were 0.33 +/- 0.09 (mean +/- S.D., n = 12) and 0.43 +/- 0.09 (n = 5), respectively, which are much larger than values previously reported in Drosophila but similar to those reported in the blowfly and hawkmoth. By contrast, the intra-segmental coupling coefficient between muscles #6 and #7 was smaller, 0.16 +/- 0.08 (n = 28). Other muscle cells which had apparent physical contacts with these longitudinal muscles were examined but were not electrically coupled to them. Nerve-evoked as well as miniature excitatory junctional potentials were found also electrotonically spread across the segmental boundary. The inter-segmental coupling between muscle #6s was not blocked by the gap junction inhibitors halothane or 1-octanol. Functional significance of this electrical coupling is apparently in coordination of larval body movements.

Indexed as

1-OctanolAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterElectrophysiologyHalothaneLarvaMusclesNeuromuscular JunctionSynaptic Transmission1-OctanolHalothane

Identifiers

PMID9372149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.