Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9367418›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1997

Quantitative analysis of C4Ab and C4Bb binding to the C3b/C4b receptor (CR1, CD35).

B D Reilly, C Mold

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B D ReillyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 53201, USA.
C Mold
University of New Mexico · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

ISOTYPES OF THE FOURTH COMPONENT OF COMPLEMENT C4F32AI008152 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI REILLY, BRIAN · 1990 to 1993
–
INTERACTIONS OF C4 ISOTYPES WITH COMPLEMENT RECEPTOR CR1R01AR042538 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MOLD, CAROLYN · 1994 to 1997
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI 08152NIAMS NIH HHS AR 42538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complement-dependent clearance of immune complexes in humans is dependent on the activation and binding of the early components of the classical complement cascade. This prevents immune complex precipitation and promotes binding of the complexes by the C4b/C3b complement receptor CR1 (CD35) found on erythrocytes. The fourth component of human complement is encoded by two closely linked genes within the MHC. These genes give rise to the isotypic forms C4A and C4B, and recent studies suggest that CR1 binds activated C4A (C4Ab) to a greater extent than activated C4B (C4Bb). To study this difference in a more quantitative way the binding reactions between CR1 and C4Ab- and C4Bb-coated immune complexes and between CR1 and soluble dimers of C4Ab (C4Ab2) and C4Bb (C4Bb2) were analysed using the native receptor on human erythrocytes. The binding reaction between immune complexes with equivalent amounts of covalently bound C4Ab or C4Bb and erythrocyte CR1 showed a two-fold higher binding of complexes coated with C4A. Furthermore, erythrocyte CR1 bound C4Ab2 with an apparent four-fold higher affinity (Kd approximately 1.4 x 10(-7) M) than C4Bb2 (Kd approximately 4.8 x 10(-7) M), indicating a preferential binding of CR1 for C4A.

Indexed as

Antigen-Antibody ComplexComplement C4aComplement C4bErythrocytesHumansProtein BindingRadioligand AssayReceptors, Complement 3bAntigen-Antibody ComplexComplement C4aComplement C4bReceptors, Complement 3b

Identifiers

PMID9367418
PMCPMC2265500
OpenAlexW2020407743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.