Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9366568›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation1997

Lupus-specific antibodies reveal an altered pattern of somatic mutation.

A J Manheimer-Lory, G Zandman-Goddard, A Davidson, C Aranow, B Diamond

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Mucosal immunology of HIV infection.Immunological reviews · 2013
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A genetic lesion that arrests plasma cell homing to the bone marrow.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Somatic hypermutation in human B cell subsets.Springer seminars in immunopathology · 2001
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A J Manheimer-LoryDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.
G Zandman-Goddard
A Davidson
C Aranow
B Diamond
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USState University of New York · US

Funding

ANTIDNA ANTIBODIES IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUSR37AR032371 · NIAMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI DIAMOND, BETTY · 1996 to 2005
$3.0M
ANTIDNA ANTIBODIES IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUSR01AR032371 · NIAMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI DIAMOND, BETTY · 1986 to 1995
–
USING IDIOTYPES TO ASSESS SLE IN MINORITY WOMENR01AR042481 · NIAMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, ANNE · 1993 to 1995
–
NIAMS NIH HHS AR-32371NIAMS NIH HHS AR-42481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The F4 idiotype is a heavy chain determinant expressed almost exclusively on IgG immunoglobulins and is highly associated with specificity for double-stranded DNA. Since high-titered F4 expression is present predominantly in sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we thought F4+ IgG antibodies might constitute a useful subset of immunoglobulins in which to investigate lupus-specific alterations in variable (V) region gene expression or in the process of somatic mutation. This molecular analysis of F4+ B cell lines generated from lupus patients demonstrates that despite the strong association of F4 reactivity with specificity for native DNA, there is no apparent VH gene restriction. Furthermore, VH gene segments encoding these antibodies are also used in protective immune responses. An examination of the process of somatic mutation in F4+ antibodies showed no abnormality in frequency of somatic mutation nor in the distribution of mutations in complementarity-determining regions or framework regions. However, there was a decrease in targeting of mutations to putative mutational hot spots. This subtle difference in mutations present in these antibodies may reflect an intrinsic defect in mutational machinery or, more likely, altered state of B cell activation that affects the mutational process and perhaps also negative selection.

Indexed as

Point MutationAmino Acid SequenceAntibodies, AntinuclearAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, ViralBase SequenceCell Line, TransformedGene RearrangementHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin IsotypesImmunoglobulin Light ChainsImmunoglobulin Variable RegionLupus Erythematosus, SystemicAntibodies, AntinuclearAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin IsotypesImmunoglobulin Light ChainsImmunoglobulin Variable Region

Identifiers

PMID9366568
PMCPMC508454
OpenAlexW2160930032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.