ReviewDrugs1997
Manipulation of coagulation factors in acute stroke.
Review in Drugs, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with an acute cerebral infarction, anticoagulation may spare tissue in the ischaemic penumbra from irreversible necrosis by preventing thrombus extension from a vascular bed with good collateral circulation to one with poor collateral circulation. In addition to the possibility of limiting infarct volume, anticoagulation may be given acutely to prevent early recurrent cerebral infarction or to prevent or treat thrombus outside the nervous system (i.e. deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolus). In one controlled trial of a low molecular weight heparin, administration of nadroparin calcium within 48 hours of onset of cerebral infarction decreased the combined incidence of dependency and all-cause mortality at 6 months. Another controlled trial in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis demonstrated the benefit of continuous intravenous adjusted-dose unfractionated (UF) heparin compared with placebo. Although results of anticoagulation appear promising in patients with acute cerebral infarction and cerebral venous thrombosis, the benefits of these agents remain unconfirmed. The results of large multicentre trials using a heparinoid (ORG 10172) and subcutaneous UF heparin in patients with acute cerebral infarction are expected within the year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.