Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9355998›Full record

ArticleJAMA1997

Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk.

Z Huang, S E Hankinson, G A Colditz, M J Stampfer, D J Hunter, J E Manson, C H Hennekens, B Rosner, F E Speizer, W C Willett

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Obesity and mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2009
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Weight gain prevention among women.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2007
    Trial
  18. Results of a faith-based weight loss intervention for black women.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2005
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Z HuangDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
S E Hankinson
G A Colditz
M J Stampfer
D J Hunter
J E Manson
C H Hennekens
B Rosner
F E Speizer
W C Willett

Funding

Harvard Education Program in Cancer Prevention Control (R25T)R25CA057711 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI DAVISON, KIRSTEN · 1992 to 2018
$8.5M
PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIET AND CANCER IN WOMENR01CA040356 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SPEIZER, FRANK E · 1985 to 2000
$824k
PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIET AND CANCER IN WOMENR37CA040356 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SPEIZER, FRANK E · 1987 to 1994
–
NCI NIH HHS 5-R25-CA57711-04NCI NIH HHS CA40356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextBreast cancer is a major cause of mortality among women. It is important to identify modifiable risk factors for this disease.

objectiveTo examine body mass index (BMI) at the age of 18 years and at midlife and adult weight change in relation to breast cancer incidence and mortality.

designCohort study.

settingA cohort of 95256 US female nurses aged 30 to 55 years who were followed up for 16 years.

main outcome measureIncident and fatal breast cancer.

resultsDuring 1203498 person-years, 2517 incident breast cancers (60% postmenopausal) were documented. Higher current BMI was associated with lower breast cancer incidence before menopause and was minimally associated with incidence after menopause. However, a stronger positive relationship was seen among postmenopausal women who never used hormone replacement (relative risk=1.59 for BMI >31 kg/m2 vs < or = 20 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.32; P for trend <.001). Higher BMI at the age of 18 years was associated with lower breast cancer incidence both before and after menopause. Weight gain after the age of 18 years was unrelated to breast cancer incidence before menopause, but was positively associated with incidence after menopause. This increased risk with weight gain was limited to women who never used postmenopausal hormones; among these women, the relative risk was 1.99 (95% confidence interval, 1.43-2.76) for weight gain of more than 20 kg vs unchanged weight (P for trend <.001). Current BMI and weight gain were even more strongly associated with fatal postmenopausal breast cancer. In this population, the percentage of postmenopausal breast cancer accounted for by weight gain alone was approximately 16% and by hormone replacement therapy alone was 5%, but when the interaction between these variables was considered, together they accounted for about one third of postmenopausal breast cancers.

conclusionsAvoiding adult weight gain may contribute importantly to the prevention of breast cancer after menopause, particularly among women who do not use postmenopausal hormones.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexWeight GainAdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMenopauseMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisObesityProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID9355998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.