ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1997
Detection of gene-environment interactions in joint segregation and linkage analysis.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian Semiparametric Estimation of Cancer-specific Age-at-onset Penetrance with Application to Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2019Article
- Challenges and opportunities in genome-wide environmental interaction (GWEI) studies.Human genetics · 2012Review
- Joint effects of germ-line TP53 mutation, MDM2 SNP309, and gender on cancer risk in family studies of Li-Fraumeni syndrome.Human genetics · 2011Article
- Gene--environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2010Review
- Effects of measured susceptibility genes on cancer risk in family studies.Human genetics · 2010Article
- Diplotype trend regression analysis of the ADH gene cluster and the ALDH2 gene: multiple significant associations with alcohol dependence.American journal of human genetics · 2006Article
- Machine learning for detecting gene-gene interactions: a review.Applied bioinformatics · 2006Article
- Bias and efficiency in family-based gene-characterization studies: conditional, prospective, retrospective, and joint likelihoods.American journal of human genetics · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We compare approaches for analysis of gene-environment (G x E) interaction, using segregation and joint segregation and linkage analyses of a quantitative trait. Analyses of triglyceride levels in a single large pedigree demonstrate the two methods and show evidence for a significant interaction (P=.015 when segregation analysis is used; P=.006 when joint analysis is used) between a codominant major gene and body-mass index. Genotype-specific correlation coefficients, between triglyceride levels and body-mass index, estimated from the joint model are rAA=.72, rAa=.49, and raa=. 20. Several simulation studies indicate that joint segregation and linkage analysis leads to less-biased and more-efficient estimates of a G x E-interaction effect, compared with segregation analysis alone. Depending on the heterozygosity of the marker locus and its proximity to the trait locus, we found joint analysis to be as much as 70% more efficient than segregation analysis, for estimation of a G x E-interaction effect. Over a variety of parameter combinations, joint analysis also led to moderate (5%-10%) increases in power to detect the interaction. On the basis of these results, we suggest the use of combined segregation and linkage analysis for improved estimation of G x E-interaction effects when the underlying trait gene is unmeasured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.