ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)1997
Children's and adolescents' anaerobic performance during cycle ergometry.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concurrent and Construct Validity of the DiagnoformJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Effect of somatic maturity on the aerobic and anaerobic adaptations to sprint interval training.Physiological reports · 2020Article
- Short-term muscle power during growth and maturation.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2002Review
- Metabolic and hormonal responses to exercise in children and adolescents.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cycle ergometry studies originated in the early 1900s but it was not until the early 1970s that the first studies of children and anaerobic performance were established. Since that time, research into the anaerobic performance of children and adolescents has proliferated, mainly due to attempts by investigators to overcome methodological problems. Besides the increase in studies using the most popular anaerobic test, the friction-braked Wingate, other tests such as the force-velocity and isokinetic cycle ergometers are becoming more common. No matter how the data are standardised, there is unequivocal agreement that children's and adolescents' anaerobic power scores are lower than those of adults. Qualitative muscular differences are often cited for this disparity rather than differences in the quantity of muscle, but conclusive research is lacking in this area. Despite the ethical considerations involved in studies with children, cycle ergometry has aided researchers to assess external short term power output, mean power and fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9339492What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.