ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal1997
Differences in nucleotide effects on intracellular pH, Na+/H+ antiport activity, and ATP-binding proteins in endothelial cells.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bovine (BPAEC) and human (HPAEC) pulmonary artery endothelial cell monolayers were incubated with either ATP, ATP analogues, or UTP, followed by measurement of intracellular pH (pHi) and the rate of recovery from acidosis. ATP increased baseline pHi and the rate of acid recovery in BPAEC. This response was inhibited by the amiloride analogue, methyisobutylamiloride, demonstrating that activation of the Na+/H+ antiport was responsible for the increase in baseline pHi and the recovery from acidosis. This response had the features of both a P2Y and P2U purinergic receptor, based on the responses to a series of ATP analogues and UTP. In contrast, none of the nucleotides had any significant effect on pHi and Na+/H+ antiport activity in HPAEC. This difference in the response to extracellular nucleotides was not due to a difference in ATP metabolism between cell types, since the ectonucleotidase-resistant analogue. ATP gamma S, also had no effect on HPAEC. Analogues of cAMP had no effect on pHi or acid recovery in either cell type. Incubation of BPAEC and HPAEC with the photoaffinity ligand [32P] 8-AzATP indicated that both BPAEC and HPAEC possess an ATP-binding protein of 48 kDa. However, BPAEC exhibited an additional binding protein of 87 kDa. Thus, the contrasting response to extracellular ATP between bovine and human pulmonary artery endothelial cells may be related to differences in the signal transduction pathway leading to antiport activation, including different ATP-binding sites on the cell membrane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.