Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9336666›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews1997

Progress towards development of a vaccine for amebiasis.

S L Stanley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of the PEJournal of immunology research · 2021
    Article
  2. Update on laboratory diagnosis of amoebiasis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Amebic infection in humans.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Amebic Liver Abscess.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2002
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Cysteine proteinases and the pathogenesis of amebiasis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2000
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S L StanleyDepartment of Medicine and Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. sstanley@im.wustl.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of molecular biologic techniques over the past decade has seen a tremendous growth in our knowledge of the biology of Entamoeba histolytica, the causative agent of amebic dysentery and amebic liver abscess. This approach has also led to the identification and structural characterization of three amebic antigens, the serine-rich Entamoeba histolytica protein (SREHP), the 170-kDa subunit of the Gal/GalNAc binding lectin, and the 29-kDa cysteine-rich protein, which all show promise as recombinant antigen-based vaccines to prevent amebiasis. In recent studies, an immunogenic dodecapeptide derived from the SREHP molecule has been genetically fused to the B subunit of cholera toxin, to create a recombinant protein capable of inducing both antiamebic and anti-cholera toxin antibodies when administered by the oral route. Continued progress in this area will bring us closer to the goal of a cost-effective oral combination "enteric pathogen" vaccine, capable of inducing protective mucosal immune responses to several clinically important enteric diseases, including amebiasis.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanCholera ToxinEntamoeba histolyticaEntamoebiasisHumansProtozoan ProteinsProtozoan VaccinesRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, ConjugateVaccines, SyntheticAntigens, ProtozoanCholera ToxinProtozoan ProteinsProtozoan VaccinesRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, ConjugateVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID9336666
PMCPMC172938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.