Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9334385›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience1997

Contingent-dependent enhancement of rhythmic motor patterns: an in vitro analog of operant conditioning.

R Nargeot, D A Baxter, J H Byrne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Specific Plasticity Loci and Their Synergism Mediate Operant Conditioning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Successful and unsuccessful attempts to swallow in a reducedLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Complementary interactions between command-like interneurons that function to activate and specify motor programs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Functional differentiation of a population of electrically coupled heterogeneous elements in a microcircuit.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R NargeotDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
D A Baxter
J H Byrne
Texas Medical Center · US

Funding

NETWORK, CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS OF LEARNINGK05MH000649 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BYRNE, JOHN H · 1993 to 1997
–
NIMH NIH HHS K05 MH00649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Operant conditioning is characterized by the contingent reinforcement of a designated behavior. Previously, feeding behavior in Aplysia has been demonstrated to be modified by operant conditioning, and a neural pathway (esophageal nerve; E n.) that mediates some aspects of reinforcement has been identified. As a first step toward a cellular analysis of operant conditioning, we developed an in vitro buccal ganglia preparation that expressed the essential features of operant conditioning. Motor patterns that represented at least two different aspects of fictive feeding (i.e., ingestion-like and rejection-like motor patterns) were elicited by tonic stimulation of a peripheral buccal nerve (n.2,3). Three groups of preparations were examined. In a contingent-reinforcement group, stimulation of E n. was contingent on the expression of a specific type of motor pattern (i.e., either ingestion-like or rejection-like). In a yoke-control group, stimulation of E n. was not contingent on any specific pattern. In a control group, E n. was not stimulated. The frequency of the reinforced pattern increased significantly only in the contingent-reinforcement group. No changes were observed in nonreinforced patterns or in the motor patterns of the control and yoke-control groups. Contingent reinforcement of the ingestion-like pattern was associated with an enhancement of activity in motor neuron B8, and this enhancement was specific to the reinforced pattern. These results suggest that the isolated buccal ganglia expressed an essential feature of operant conditioning (i.e., contingent reinforcement modified a designated operant) and that this analog of operant conditioning is accessible to cellular analysis.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAplysiaConditioning, OperantElectric StimulationExtinction, PsychologicalFeeding BehaviorGanglia, InvertebrateModels, NeurologicalMotor NeuronsMouthNeuronal PlasticityPeriodicity

Identifiers

PMID9334385
PMCPMC6573721
OpenAlexW2167981353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.