ArticleBritish journal of cancer1997
Predictive value of c-erbB-2, p53, cathepsin-D and histology of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer.
Article in British journal of cancer, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multivariate analysis of tumour biological factors predicting response to cytotoxic treatment in advanced breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 1998Trial
- Role of Amide Proton Transfer Weighted MRI in Predicting MGMTp Methylation Status, p53-Status, Ki-67 Index, IDH-Status, and ATRX Expression in WHO Grade 4 High Grade Glioma.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- TP53 Mutations and Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Reading beyond the Headlines.Trends in cancer · 2020Review
- A Phenomic Perspective on Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Treatment: Integrating Aging and Lifestyle in Blood and Tissue Biomarker Profiling.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Microvessel density and status of p53 protein as potential prognostic factors for adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in retrospective analysis of early breast cancer patients group.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2012Article
- A literature review of molecular markers predictive of clinical response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2009Review
- DNA topoisomerase IIalpha expression and the response toprimary chemotherapy in breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2003Article
- Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome.British journal of cancer · 2003Article
- The role of biological markers as predictors of response to preoperative chemotherapy in large primary breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2003Article
- Amplification and deletion of topoisomerase IIalpha associate with ErbB-2 amplification and affect sensitivity to topoisomerase II inhibitor doxorubicin in breast cancer.The American journal of pathology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The value of various prognostic factors in breast cancer patients has been determined in a number of studies. Few reports have been published on the dependence of treatment outcome on histological and immunohistochemical characteristics in the primary tumour in patients with metastatic disease. We studied the incidence and prognostic value of histological and molecular abnormalities in the primary tumour of patients who had developed metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients received a fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen either once a week or once every 4 weeks. Adequate specimens for various analyses were available from 127 patients. Median follow-up time of the patients ranged from 15 to 101 months. In this study, the histological grade of the malignancy best predicted response to chemotherapy (P < 0.0005). Most of the responses were observed in patients with grade 1 tumours; in this group, time to progression was delayed. C-erb B-2 gene amplification and oncoprotein expression had no predictive value. Neither p53 nor cathepsin-D predicted treatment outcome after chemotherapy. None of the factors had an effect on overall survival. Among breast cancer patients who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, response to treatment correlated with histological grade. In patients with histological grade 1 breast cancer, the time to progression was longest. However, overall survival was not affected by histological grade nor the other parameters tested. In addition to histological grade, other prognostic factors that are not included in this study need to be identified to determine which patients with metastatic breast cancer would benefit from cytotoxic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.