Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9327796›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne1997

Inappropriate hospital use by patients receiving care for medical conditions: targeting utilization review.

C DeCoster, N P Roos, K C Carrière, S Peterson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Emergency Department During Long Public Holidays.Turkish journal of emergency medicine · 2014
    Article
  5. Between two beds: inappropriately delayed discharges from hospitals.International journal of health care finance and economics · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Does universal comprehensive insurance encourage unnecessary use? Evidence from Manitoba says "no".CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2004
    Article
  18. Discharges against medical advice: time to address the causes.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002
    Article
  19. How valid are utilization review tools in assessing appropriate use of acute care beds?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2000
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C DeCosterDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
N P Roos
K C Carrière
S Peterson
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe characteristics associated with inappropriate hospital use by patients in Manitoba in order to help target concurrent utilization review. Utilization review was developed to reduce inappropriate hospital use but can be a very resource-intensive process.

designRetrospective chart review of a sample of adult patients who received care for medical conditions in a sample of Manitoba hospitals during the fiscal year 1993-94; assessment of patients at admission and for each day of stay with the use of a standardized set of objective, nondiagnosis-based criteria (InterQual). PATIENTS: A total of 3904 patients receiving care at 26 hospitals. OUTCOME MEASURES: Acute (appropriate) and nonacute (inappropriate) admissions and days of stay for adult patients receiving care for medical conditions.

resultsAfter 1 week, 53.2% of patients assessed as needing acute care at admission no longer required acute care. Patients 75 years of age or older consumed more than 50% of the days of stay, and 74.8% of these days of stay were inappropriate. Four diagnostic categories accounted for almost 60% of admissions and days, and more than 50% of those days of stay were inappropriate. Patients admitted through the emergency department were more likely to require acute care (60.9%) than others (41.7%). Patients who were Treaty Indians had a higher proportion of days of stay requiring acute care than others (45.9% v. 32.8%). Patients' income and day of the week on admission (weekday v. weekend) were not predictive factors of inappropriate use.

conclusionRather than conducting a utilization review for every patient, hospitals might garner more information by targeting patients receiving care for medical conditions with stays longer than 1 week, patients with nervous system, circulatory, respiratory or digestive diagnoses, elderly patients and patients not admitted through the emergency department.

Indexed as

Health Services MisuseUtilization ReviewAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHospitalizationHumansIndians, North AmericanLength of StayManitobaMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID9327796
PMCPMC1228213
OpenAlexW2132098019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.