Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9315675›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1997

Developmental regulation of DNA replication: replication fork barriers and programmed gene amplification in Tetrahymena thermophila.

Z Zhang, D M Macalpine, G M Kapler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Extreme polyploidy in a large bacterium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Replication fork stalling at natural impediments.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2007
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Z ZhangDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-1114, USA.
D M Macalpine
G M Kapler
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Replication and Amplification of Tetrahymena rDNAR01GM053572 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI KAPLER, GEOFFREY M. · 2002 to 2010
$2.1M
REPLICATION AND AMPLIFICATION OF TETRAHYMENA RDNAR29GM053572 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI KAPLER, GEOFFREY M. · 1996 to 2000
$110k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM53572-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The palindromic Tetrahymena ribosomal DNA (rDNA) minichromosome is amplified 10,000-fold during development. Subsequent vegetative replication is cell cycle regulated. rDNA replication differs fundamentally in cycling vegetative and nondividing amplifying cells. Using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, we show for the first time that replication origins that direct gene amplification also function in normal dividing cells. Two classes of amplification intermediates were identified. The first class is indistinguishable from vegetative rDNA, initiating in just one of the two 5' nontranscribed spacer (NTS) copies in the rDNA palindrome at either of two closely spaced origins. Thus, these origins are active throughout the life cycle and their regulation changes at different developmental stages. The second, novel class of amplification intermediates is generated by multiple initiation events. Intermediates with mass greater than fully replicated DNA were observed, suggesting that onionskin replication occurs at this stage. Unlike amplified rDNA in Xenopus laevis, the novel Tetrahymena species are not produced by random initiation; replication also initiates in the 5' NTS. Surprisingly, a replication fork barrier which is activated only in these amplifying molecules blocks the progression of forks near the center of the palindrome. Whereas barriers have been previously described, this is the first instance in which programmed regulation of replication fork progression has been demonstrated in a eukaryote.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA, ProtozoanDNA ReplicationDNA, RibosomalGene AmplificationPromoter Regions, GeneticReplication OriginTetrahymena thermophilaDNA, ProtozoanDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID9315675
PMCPMC232465
OpenAlexW2150900356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.