Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9315647›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1997

Stability of patch methylation and its impact in regions of transcriptional initiation and elongation.

C L Hsieh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. FXR silencing in human colon cancer by DNA methylation and KRAS signaling.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The effect of methylated oligonucleotide targeting Ki-67 gene in human 786-0 renal carcinoma cells.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

C L HsiehNorris Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA. hsieh_c@froggy.hsu.usc.edu
University of Southern California · US

Funding

IMPACT AND DYNAMICS OF DNA METHYLATION IN HUMAN CELLSR01GM054781 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HSIEH, CHIH-LIN · 1996 to 2004
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM54781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CpG DNA methylation has previously been correlated with the suppression of transcription. The mechanism of this suppression is not understood, and many aspects of the temporal and positional relationships between the region of methylation and transcription have not yet been defined. Here, 12-kb stable replicating episomes that can be maintained in human somatic cells for weeks to months were used. Such a system allows more direct manipulation and is free from the positional effects attendant with the analysis of endogenous loci or integrated transgenes. By using these circular minichromosomes, patches of CpG methylation were created to include or exclude the regions of transcriptional initiation and elongation. I found that a 0.5-kb patch of methylation that covered the promoter suppressed expression only 2-fold and that a 1.9-kb patch of methylation that covered the coding portion of the gene (but not the promoter) suppressed expression about 10-fold. In contrast, methylation of the entire minichromosome except for the promoter or the coding portion suppressed transcription about 50- to 200-fold. I infer the following. Methylation of the 0.5-kb promoter fragment does not significantly affect transcription at the level of transcription factor binding or local chromatin structure. The dominant effect on transcription occurs when the length of methylated DNA is long, with little disproportionate effect of methylation of specific regions, such as that of initiation or elongation. I also found that the boundaries between these methylated and unmethylated regions remained stable for the many weeks that I monitored them.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationCell LineCpG IslandsGene Expression RegulationGenesHumansKidneyLuciferasesPlasmidsPromoter Regions, GeneticRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidTranscription, GeneticLuciferases

Identifiers

PMID9315647
PMCPMC232437
OpenAlexW2102801755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.