ArticleBritish journal of cancer1997
Cellular fibronectin concentration in the plasma of patients with malignant and benign diseases: a comparison with CA 19-9 and CEA.
Article in British journal of cancer, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Fibronectin fibrils regulate TGF-β1-induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2017Article
- ER stress-mediated cell damage contributes to the release of EDAJournal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2017Article
- Fibronectin: functional character and role in alcoholic liver disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011Review
- Cellular fibronectin stimulates hepatocytes to produce factors that promote alcohol-induced liver injury.World journal of hepatology · 2011Article
- Article
- Evaluation of cellular fibronectin plasma levels as a useful staging tool in different stages of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and renal cell carcinoma.Biomarker insights · 2007Article
- Utility of serum CA19-9 in diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma: in comparison with CEA.World journal of gastroenterology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EDAcFN enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is a new tumour marker assay measuring the extra domain A-containing isoform of cellular fibronectin (cFN), a component mainly found in extracellular matrices. The concentration cFN was measured in plasma and serum from 468 patients with malignant and benign diseases. The concentrations of cFN were higher in plasma than in serum. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, determination from plasma was superior to serum at specificity levels higher than 78% and was chosen for further analysis. The highest frequencies of elevated cFN values were seen in patients with hepato-pancreato-biliary malignancies (50-67%). In pancreatic and bile duct cancers, cFN provided little further information to that obtained by CA 19-9. The greatest advantage over CA 19-9 and CEA was seen in patients with local colorectal cancer and in hepatocellular carcinomas. Four out of nine patients with Dukes' stage B colorectal cancer had an elevated cFn level, but only one had an abnormal CEA level. In hepatocellular carcinomas, cFN was also compared with alpha-fetoprotein. The sensitivity of cFN (72%) was superior to that of AFP (61%), and concomitant use of cFN and AFP raised the sensitivity to 83%. The highest frequencies of elevated values in patients with benign diseases were observed in those with severe liver disease (32%) and biliary (17%) and pancreatic (24%) diseases. A combination of cFN and CA 19-9 showed the highest overall sensitivity of 47%, compared with 31% for cFN and 33% for CA 19-9. The corresponding specificities were 76% for cFN +/- CA 19-9, 85% for cFN and 83% for CA 19-9. The accuracy of a combination of cFN and CA 19-9 or CEA (60% respectively) was higher than that of cFN (55%), CA 19-9 (55%) or CEA (45%) alone. In conclusion, the results of the new cFN test are encouraging and further studies on larger patient materials have been started.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.