Transcription factors and aging.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. An Epigenetic Aging Clock for Cattle Using Portable Sequencing Technology.Frontiers in genetics · 2021
   Article
2. Transcriptional Signatures of Aging.Journal of molecular biology · 2017
   Review
3. Systems genetics of the nuclear factor-κB signal transduction network. I. Detection of several quantitative trait loci potentially relevant to aging.Mechanisms of ageing and development · 2012
   Article
4. Apocynin improves insulin resistance through suppressing inflammation in high-fat diet-induced obese mice.Mediators of inflammation · 2010
   Article
5. An integrated theory of ageing in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.Journal of anatomy · 2000
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as