Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9307012›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal1997

Re-activation of Clostridium symbiosum glutamate dehydrogenase from subunits denatured by urea.

S Aghajanian, P C Engel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S AghajanianDepartment of Biochemistry, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland.
P C Engel
University College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a study of the re-activation of urea-denatured clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) the maximum re-activation achieved without any added ligands was about 6%, but with NAD+ and 2-oxoglutarate in combination about 70%. NAD+ alone was also effective but 2-oxoglutarate was not, in striking contrast with the opposite pattern for protection of this enzyme against unfolding in urea [Aghajanian, Martin and Engel (1995) Biochem. J. 311,905-910]. The extent of re-activation was not increased by raising the incubation temperature to 37 degrees C and was independent of the time of enzyme denaturation. CD and fluorimetric studies showed that dilution of denatured enzyme into potassium phosphate buffer led to rapid (half-time <3-5 s)formation of 'structured' intermediates with secondary structure similar to that of native enzyme. These intermediate molecules were inactive, behaved as monomers on a size-exclusion column, and were unable to associate to give the native hexameric structure. Addition of NAD+ facilitated isomerization of these 'structured' monomers into a form(s) capable of re-activation. A side effect in the refolding process was non-specific aggregation, depending on final enzyme concentration. The hexamer fraction from re-activated samples, however, showed the same specific activity as native enzyme. The portion of the enzyme that is not lost through aggregation thus appears to regain the native structure fully. Detailed time-course studies showed that re-activation follows second-order kinetics, suggesting that formation of a dimer may be the rate-limiting step. The possible mechanism for the unfolding and refolding processes of clostridial GDH and effects of coenzyme and substrate on these are discussed in relation to the known crystal structure.

Indexed as

ClostridiumEnzyme ActivationGlutamate DehydrogenaseKineticsProtein FoldingUreaGlutamate DehydrogenaseUrea

Identifiers

PMID9307012
PMCPMC1218717
OpenAlexW2335420436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.