ArticleSurgery today1997
The invasion-MTT assay as a predictor of liver metastasis using human gastrointestinal carcinomas transplanted in nude mice.
Article in Surgery today, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The invasion-3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, which evaluates invasive potential into the reconstituted basement membrane, Matrigel, was performed on 49 human gastrointestinal carcinomas transplanted in nude mice. There were 19 colorectal carcinomas, 10 pancreatic carcinomas, 10 gastric carcinomas, 8 esophageal carcinomas, and 2 bile duct carcinomas. The percent invasion (PI) value of each tumor by the invasion-MTT assay expresses the invasive rate of tumor cells into the Matrigel as a percentage. There were no significant differences in correlations between the PI values and primary tumor site, clinicopathological findings, tumor doubling time, or DNA index; however, the PI values of primary tumors and lymph nodes with liver metastases were significantly higher than those of primary tumors without liver metastasis (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the primary tumors with synchronous (P < 0.05) or asynchronous (P < 0.01) liver metastases showed significantly higher PI values compared with the primary tumors without liver metastases. These results suggest that PI is not only an independent factor to predict liver metastasis, but it also correlates closely with liver metastasis. Thus, the invasion-MTT assay for primary tumors might be clinically useful to predict liver metastasis in patients following surgery for gastrointestinal carcinomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.