Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9306051›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1997

Pharmacological importance of stereochemical resolution of enantiomeric drugs.

M R Islam, J G Mahdi, I D Bowen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Potential Stereoselective Binding ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M R IslamSchool of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, UK.
J G Mahdi
I D Bowen
University of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug enantiomers have identical properties in an achiral environment, but should be considered as different chemical compounds. This is because they often differ considerably in potency, pharmacological activity and pharmacokinetic profile, since the modules with which they interact in biological systems are also optically active. Within biological systems, the metabolism of one isomer may be via a different pathway or occur at a different rate from that of the other isomer. Preferential binding of one isomer to plasma proteins may cause differences in circulating free drug and hence alter concentrations at active sites. Interactions of both isomers may differ at the active sites through which pharmacological action is mediated. Actions and levels of activity of the stereoisomers in vivo may also differ. All the pharmacological activity may reside in a single enantiomer, whereas several possibilities exist for the other enantiomer-- it may be inactive, have a qualitatively different effect, an antagonistic effect or produce greater toxicity. Two isomers may have nearly identical qualitative pharmacological activity, qualitatively similar pharmacological activity but quantitatively different potency, or qualitatively different pharmacological activity. To avoid adverse effects and optimise the therapeutic value of enantiomeric drugs, it is necessary that methods for the resolution of racemates be evolved and devolved to determine isomeric purity, establish the effectiveness of isomers of the drug, and detect the presence of an enantiomer with lower therapeutic activity and undesirable adverse effects. Even if a drug is given as a pure enantiomer, methods to discriminate between enantiomers are required because racemisation can occur both in vitro and in vivo. Methods developed for resolution of drug enantiomers should facilitate routine testing of single isomers and their metabolites, studies of pharmacological, toxicological and clinical effectiveness, routine analysis of racemates, pure enantiomers or intermediates in manufacturing processes, and investigation of the potential for inversion of an enantiopure drug substance during the early stages of drug development and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Indexed as

PharmacokineticsStereoisomerismDrug DesignDrug InteractionsIn Vitro TechniquesPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacologyStructure-Activity RelationshipPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID9306051
OpenAlexW1999639195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.