Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9303302›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal1997

The GroE chaperonin machine is a major modulator of the CIRCE heat shock regulon of Bacillus subtilis.

A Mogk, G Homuth, C Scholz, L Kim, F X Schmid, W Schumann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 258 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Membrane Localization of RNase Y Is Important for Global Gene Expression inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Update on the Protein Homeostasis Network inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Feeling the Heat: TheBiomolecules · 2021
    Article
  16. A global transcriptomic analysis ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A MogkInstitute of Genetics, University of Bayreuth, Germany.
G Homuth
C Scholz
L Kim
F X Schmid
W Schumann
University of Bayreuth · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Class I heat-inducible genes in Bacillus subtilis consist of the heptacistronic dnaK and the bicistronic groE operon and form the CIRCE regulon. Both operons are negatively regulated at the level of transcription by the HrcA repressor interacting with its operator, the CIRCE element. Here, we demonstrate that the DnaK chaperone machine is not involved in the regulation of HrcA and that the GroE chaperonin exerts a negative effect in the post-transcriptional control of HrcA. When expression of the groE operon was turned off, the dnaK operon was significantly activated and large amounts of apparently inactive HrcA repressor were produced. Overproduction of GroEL, on the other hand, resulted in decreased expression of the dnaK operon. Introduction of the hrcA gene and its operator into Escherichia coli was sufficient to elicit a transient heat shock response, indicating that no additional Bacillus-specific gene(s) was needed. As in B. subtilis, the groEL gene of E. coli negatively influenced the activity of HrcA. HrcA could be overproduced in E. coli, but formed inclusion bodies which could be dissolved in 8 M urea. Upon removal of urea, HrcA had a strong tendency to aggregate, but aggregation could be suppressed significantly by the addition of GroEL. Purified HrcA repressor was able specifically to retard a DNA fragment containing the CIRCE element, and the amount of retarded DNA was increased significantly in the presence of GroEL. These results suggest that the GroE chaperonin machine modulates the activity of the HrcA repressor and therefore point to a novel function of GroE as a modulator of the heat shock response.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli ProteinsBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60ChaperoninsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coliGenes, BacterialHeat-Shock ProteinsHot TemperatureHSP40 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesMutationBacterial ProteinsChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60ChaperoninsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsdnaK protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGroE protein, E coliGrpE protein, BacteriaGrpE protein, E coliHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP40 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID9303302
PMCPMC1170084
OpenAlexW2012547722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.