Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9297633›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN1997

Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) in the peripheral nervous system during development and regeneration.

J Nunez, I Fischer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Resurrecting the Mysteries of Big Tau.Trends in neurosciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J NunezDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Allegheny University, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA.
I Fischer
Allegheny College · US

Funding

NINDS NIH HHS NS 24707NINDS NIH HHS NS 24725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we have described the structure and distribution of the various variants of the microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), tau, MAP2, MAP1A, and MAP1B, that are expressed in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal cord during development and regeneration. We have summarized the data on their gene structure and compared the sequence of the major transcripts encoding these MAPs that are expressed in the brain, the spinal cord, and the DRG. Finally, we have surveyed the studies that used a variety of experimental approaches (e.g., antisense inhibition, transgenic knockouts, and expression in neuronal and nonneuronal cells) to understand the functional significance of MAPs heterogeneity and differences observed between the central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral nervous system (PNS) both during development and regeneration.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAlternative SplicingAnimalsAxonsBrainGanglia, SpinalHumansMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsPeripheral Nervous SystemSpinal CordTranscription, GeneticMicrotubule-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID9297633
OpenAlexW1994234870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.