Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9291955›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology1997

Comparative genetics in the grasses.

K M Devos, M D Gale

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Expression Analysis of Hairpin RNA CarryingBioMed research international · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification and diversity of functional centromere satellites in the wild rice species Oryza brachyantha.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Centromere retention and loss during the descent of maize from a tetraploid ancestor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K M DevosJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney, UK.
M D Gale

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genetic studies have demonstrated that gene content and orders are highly conserved, both at the map and megabase level, between different species within the grass family. Integration of the genetic maps of rice, foxtail millet, sugar cane, sorghum, maize, the Triticeae cereals and oats into a single synthesis reveals that some chromosome arrangements characterise taxonomic groups, while others have arisen during or after speciation. A detailed analysis of the comparative maps of seven species, belonging to three subfamilies, and their applications are described below.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantAvenaEdible GrainOryzaPanicumPoaceaeTriticumZea mays

Identifiers

PMID9291955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.