Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9286665›Full record

ArticleGenetics1997

Mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of the pheromone signal transduction pathway in the chemotropic response to pheromone.

K Schrick, B Garvik, L H Hartwell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Harnessing Fungi Signaling in Living Composites.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A peroxidase-derived ligand that inducesFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. mSphere · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cell biology of yeast zygotes, from genesis to budding.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chemical gradients and chemotropism in yeast.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2009
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A role for a complex between activated G protein-coupled receptors in yeast cellular mating.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K SchrickDepartment of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7360, USA.
B Garvik
L H Hartwell
University of Washington · US

Funding

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE EUKARYOTIC CELL CYCLER37GM017709 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HARTWELL, LELAND H · 1990 to 2000
$534k
NIGMS NIH HHS R37-GM17709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mating process in yeast has two distinct aspects. One is the induction and activation of proteins required for cell fusion in response to a pheromone signal; the other is chemotropism, i.e., detection of a pheromone gradient and construction of a fusion site available to the signaling cell. To determine whether components of the signal transduction pathway necessary for transcriptional activation also play a role in chemotropism, we examined strains with null mutations in components of the signal transduction pathway for diploid formation, prezygote formation and the chemotropic process of mating partner discrimination when transcription was induced downstream of the mutation. Cells mutant for components of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade (ste5, ste20, ste11, ste7 or fus3 kss1) formed diploids at a frequency 1% that of the wild-type control, but formed prezygotes as efficiently as the wild-type control and showed good mating partner discrimination, suggesting that the MAP kinase cascade is not essential for chemotropism. In contrast, cells mutant for the receptor (ste2) or the beta or gamma subunit (ste4 and ste18) of the G protein were extremely defective in both diploid and prezygote formation and discriminated poorly between signaling and nonsignaling mating partners, implying that these components are important for chemotropism.

Indexed as

GTP-Binding Protein alpha SubunitsHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein KinasesChemotaxisFungal ProteinsGene ExpressionGenes, FungalGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11GTP-Binding ProteinsLipoproteinsMating FactorMutationPeptidesPheromonesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein KinasesFungal ProteinsGPA1 protein, S cerevisiaeGTP-Binding Protein alpha SubunitsGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11GTP-Binding ProteinsHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsLipoproteinsMating FactorMFA2 protein, S cerevisiaePeptidesPheromonesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSTE12 protein, S cerevisiaeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID9286665
PMCPMC1208103
OpenAlexW2157729588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.