Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9284305›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1997

Inversion of Markov processes to determine rate constants from single-channel data.

M B Jackson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M B JacksonDepartment of Physiology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison 53706, USA. mjackson@macc.wisc.edu

Funding

GATING MECHANISMS OF CHEMICALLY ACTIVATED CHANNELSR01NS023512 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI JACKSON, MEYER B. · 1986 to 1998
–
NINDS NIH HHS NS23512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The determination of rate constants from single-channel data can be very difficult, in part because the single-channel lifetime distributions commonly analyzed by experimenters often have a complicated mathematical relation to the channel gating mechanism. The standard treatment of channel gating as a Markov process leads to the prediction that lifetime distributions are exponential functions. As the number of states of a channel gating scheme increases, the number of exponential terms in the lifetime distribution increases, and the weights and decay constants of the lifetime distributions become progressively more complicated functions of the underlying rate constants. In the present study a mathematical strategy for inverting these functions is introduced in order to determine rate constants from single-channel lifetime distributions. This inversion is easy for channel gating schemes with two or fewer states of a given conductance, so the present study focuses on schemes with more states. The procedure is to derive explicit equations relating the parameters of the lifetime distribution to the rate constants of the scheme. Such equations can be derived using the equality between symmetric functions of eigenvalues of a matrix and sums over principle minors, as well as expressions for the moments, derivatives, and weights of a lifetime distribution. The rate constants are then obtained as roots to this system of equations. For a gating scheme with three sequential closed states and a single gateway state, exact analytical expressions were found for each rate constant in terms of the parameters of the three-exponential closed-time distribution. For several other gating schemes, systems of equations were found that could be solved numerically to obtain the rate constants. Lifetime distributions were shown to specify a unique set of real rate constants in sequential gating schemes with up to five closed or five open states. For kinetic schemes with multiple gating pathways, the analysis of simulated data revealed multiple solutions. These multiple solutions could be distinguished by examining two-dimensional probability density functions. The utility of the methods introduced here are demonstrated by analyzing published data on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, GABA(A) receptors, and NMDA receptors.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingAnimalsConfidence IntervalsIon ChannelsKineticsMarkov ChainsModels, ChemicalProbabilityReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, NicotinicReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateStructure-Activity RelationshipTorpedoIon ChannelsReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, NicotinicReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID9284305
PMCPMC1181037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.