Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9281871›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1997

Dog bites in Bosnia.

A Croft, R Archer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A CroftHeadquarters Multinational Division Southwest (Rear), Divulje Barracks Split.
R Archer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRabies is a zoonosis that remains endemic in most parts of the world. Primary care physicians are in the first line of defence against the disease. An increasing number of British practitioners and medical students are being exposed to the dangers of rabies through humanitarian work on overseas attachments. Rabies is enzootic throughout Bosnia-Herzegovina and presents a hazard to the multinational troops currently deployed there.

aimTo describe the British Army's experience of animal bites and rabies prevention in Bosnia during the first six months of its current peace enforcement mission, and to make general recommendations on the good management of any rabies hazard at primary care level and under field conditions.

methodsRoutine data from the Army's epidemiological database (ARRC 97) were reviewed, and theatre issues of rabies vaccine and immune globulin were used as a proxy measure for administered post-exposure prophylaxis.

resultsA total of 62 animal bites were reported in British troops between December 1995 and May 1996, of which 28 were unprovoked bites and resulted in the administration of a course of rabies vaccine. Ten of these were severe bites and rabies immune globulin (RIG) was administered in addition. The total cost of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis was US$6914.00.

conclusionThe prevention of rabies has major human and resource implications, and primary care staff involved in rabies post-exposure management need to be well supported in their clinical decision-making. Rabies protocols should be clear and unambiguous. The effective medical surveillance of military or humanitarian missions in rabies-enzootic areas must include the prompt reporting of animal bites. The predeployment training of medical teams should include an up-to-date assessment of the local rabies threat.

Indexed as

DogsMilitary PersonnelAnimalsBites and StingsBosnia and HerzegovinaHumansRabiesRabies VaccinesRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID9281871
PMCPMC1313054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.