Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9279878›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research1997

Liposome-mediated therapy of intracranial brain tumors in a rat model.

U S Sharma, A Sharma, R I Chau, R M Straubinger

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Safe Nanoparticles: Are We There Yet?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

U S SharmaDepartment of Pharmaceuties, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Amherst 14260-1200, USA.
A Sharma
R I Chau
R M Straubinger
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USEli Lilly (United States) · USState University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMalignant brain tumors represent a serious therapeutic challenge, and survival often is low. We investigated the delivery of doxorubicin (DXR) to rat brain tumors in situ via liposomes, to test the hypothesis that intact liposomes undergo deposition in intracranial tumor through a compromised blood-tumor vasculature. Both therapeutic effect and intra-tumor drug carrier distribution were evaluated to identify variables in carrier-mediated delivery having impact on therapy.

methodsThe rat 9L gliosarcoma tumor was implanted orthotopically in Fischer 344 rats in the caudate-putamen region. The tumor-bearing rats were treated with DXR, either free or encapsulated in long-circulating, sterically-stabilized liposomes. Anti-tumor efficacy was assessed by survival time. In parallel, liposomes labeled with a fluorescent phospholipid analog were injected into tumor-bearing rats. At predetermined intervals, the brains were perfused with fixative, sectioned, and imaged with laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM) to investigate the integrity of the tumor vascular bed and the intratumor deposition of liposomes.

resultsFree DXR given in 3 weekly iv injections was ineffective in increasing the life span of tumor-bearing rats at cumulative doses < or = 17 mg/kg, and at the highest dose (17 mg/kg) decreased survival slightly, compared to saline-treated controls. In contrast, DXR encapsulated in long-circulating liposomes mediated significant increases in life span at 17 mg/kg. Rats showed a 29% percent increase in median survival, respectively, compared to saline-control animals. The delay of treatment after tumor implantation was a major determinant of therapeutic effect. Fluorescent liposomes were deposited preferentially in tumor rather than normal brain, and were distributed non-uniformly, in close proximity to tumor blood vessels.

conclusionsLiposomes can be used to enhance delivery of drugs to brain tumors and increase therapeutic effect. The therapeutic effect may arise from release of drug from liposomes extravasated in discrete regions of the tumor vasculature and the extravascular space.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsDoxorubicinDrug CarriersFluorescenceGlioblastomaGliosarcomaLiposomesMaleMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalNeoplasm TransplantationRatsRats, Inbred F344Tissue DistributionAntineoplastic AgentsDoxorubicinDrug CarriersLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID9279878
OpenAlexW16822270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.