ReviewDrugs1997
Recognition and management of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Review in Drugs, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Pathogenic Mechanisms, Crosstalk with Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidant Therapeutic Potential.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage as a manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Article
- Anti-Ribosomal-P Antibody Association with Neuropsychiatric Lupus in Sudanese Patients Attending Rheumatology Clinic in Omdurman Military Hospital.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an inflammatory systemic disease that causes organ damage by the deposition of autoantibodies and complement activating immune complexes or by vascular occlusion due to procoagulant states associated with antiphospholipid antibodies. The vast majority of cases occur in women of childbearing age. SLE is diagnosed on the basis of its clinical manifestations and the demonstration of characteristic immunological phenomena, especially anti-nuclear antibodies. The prognosis in SLE has shown a distinct improvement over recent decades, the 5-year survival rate now approaching or exceeding 90%. The 15-year survival rate of 63 to 79%, on the other hand, underscores the need for further advances in diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Management of the disease includes regular monitoring of disease activity, avoidance of predisposing factors and close supervision of therapy. Drug therapy is guided by the activity and severity of the leading organ manifestations and ranges from nonsteroidal antirheumatic drugs to intensive treatment with cytotoxic agents. Corticosteroids remain irreplaceable for the control of acute flares. Antimalarials and azathioprine are important long term drugs for treating mild or moderate disease activity. Intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide is safer than other regimens and at least as effective as oral cyclophosphamide for severe lupus nephritis. It is also effective in the treatment of central nervous disease and of other organ-threatening manifestations. Recently, an intensified protocol which included cyclophosphamide induced long term treatment-free remission in 60% of patients. The toxicity of cyclophosphamide is considerable, but can be ameliorated by various measures. The value of several new immunosuppressants and other compounds remains to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.