Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9278174›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology1997

Foldback transposable elements in plants.

D Rebatchouk, J O Narita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Foldback-like element Galileo belongs to the P superfamily of DNA transposons and is widespread within the Drosophila genus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Diverse DNA transposons in rotifers of the class Bdelloidea.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  8. RYS1, a foldback transposon, is activated by tissue culture and shows preferential insertion points into the rye genome.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2005
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D RebatchoukDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago 60607, USA.
J O Narita
Ashland (United States) · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel transposon family was discovered in plants. This family, designated SoFT (Solanaceae Foldback Transposon), exhibit striking structural similarity to the 'foldback' class of animal transposons. SoFT elements consist of a middle segment surrounded by long terminal inverted repeats. Two of the identified SoFT elements have 'classical' foldback structure: their inverted repeats are divided into two domains. The outer domain consists of tandemly arranged subrepeats, whereas the inner domain is non-repetitive and AT-rich. The existence of foldback elements in plants as well as in animals suggests that long inverted repeat (foldback) transposons are ubiquitous among eukaryotes.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGenes, PlantNucleic Acid ConformationAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGenome, PlantIntronsMolecular Sequence DataSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSolanum lycopersicumDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID9278174
OpenAlexW2298897380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.