ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1997
Clusters of S1 nuclease-hypersensitive sites induced in vivo by DNA damage.
Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Screening and purification of natural products from actinomycetes that affect the cell shape of fission yeast.Journal of cell science · 2017Article
- Reduced local mutation density in regulatory DNA of cancer genomes is linked to DNA repair.Nature biotechnology · 2014Article
- Repair of DNA strand breaks in a minichromosome in vivo: kinetics, modeling, and effects of inhibitors.PloS one · 2013Article
- Nick-forming sequences may be involved in the organization of eukaryotic chromatin into approximately 50 kbp loops.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2006Article
- Gamma-radiation dose-rate effects on DNA damage and toxicity in bacterial cells.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2003Article
- Base excision repair is efficient in cells lacking poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1.Nucleic acids research · 2000Article
- Clustered DNA damages induced in isolated DNA and in human cells by low doses of ionizing radiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000Article
- Nuclear foci of mammalian recombination proteins are located at single-stranded DNA regions formed after DNA damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA end-labeling procedures were used to analyze both the frequency and distribution of DNA strand breaks in mammalian cells exposed or not to different types of DNA-damaging agents. The 3' ends were labeled by T4 DNA polymerase-catalyzed nucleotide exchange carried out in the absence or presence of Escherichia coli endonuclease IV to cleave abasic sites and remove 3' blocking groups. Using this sensitive assay, we show that DNA isolated from human cells or mouse tissues contains variable basal levels of DNA strand interruptions which are associated with normal bioprocesses, including DNA replication and repair. On the other hand, distinct dose-dependent patterns of DNA damage were assessed quantitatively in cultured human cells exposed briefly to menadione, methylmethane sulfonate, topoisomerase II inhibitors, or gamma rays. In vivo induction of single-strand breaks and abasic sites by methylmethane sulfonate was also measured in several mouse tissues. The genomic distribution of these lesions was investigated by DNA cleavage with the single-strand-specific S1 nuclease. Strikingly similar cleavage patterns were obtained with all DNA-damaging agents tested, indicating that the majority of S1-hypersensitive sites detected were not randomly distributed over the genome but apparently were clustered in damage-sensitive regions. The parallel disappearance of 3' ends and loss of S1-hypersensitive sites during post-gamma-irradiation repair periods indicates that these sites were rapidly repaired single-strand breaks or gaps (2- to 3-min half-life). Comparison of S1 cleavage patterns obtained with gamma-irradiated DNA and gamma-irradiated cells shows that chromatin structure was the primary determinant of the distribution of the DNA damage detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.