Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9259029›Full record

ReviewPharmacy world & science : PWS1997

The treatment of staphylococcal infections with special reference to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacoeconomic considerations.

R Janknegt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evidence of an interaction between nifedipine and nafcillin in humans.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2003
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

R JanknegtMaasland Ziekenhuis, Dept. of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Sittard, The Netherlands.
Maaslandziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The choice of antibiotics for the treatment of staphylococcal infections depends to a high degree on the susceptibility patterns in the hospital in question. These may be highly variable and considerable differences between countries and hospitals exist. The insight into the pharmacodynamic aspects of antimicrobial agents has increased considerably in the last 5 years, resulting in new treatments, such as once daily administration of aminoglycosides and continuous infusion of betalactam antibiotics. The antibiotic policy in Dutch hospitals for the treatment of staphylococcal infections is discussed. In most Western countries with a relatively low incidence of MRSA, penicillin-derivatives, such as flucloxacillin (or cloxacillin, methicillin and nafcillin) will be the drug of choice, because of their good in-vitro activity, low toxicity, good clinical efficacy and relatively low cost. If the incidence of MRSA increases, drugs such as the glycopeptides will be of more importance. This will of course have a clear economic impact, as both vancomycin and teicoplanin are considerably more expensive than agents such as flucloxacillin and oral treatment is not possible. Pharmacoeconomic aspects also play a role. As a rule, intravenous antimicrobial agents are considerably more expensive than the oral formulations. Before oral administration can be recommended, a reliable oral absorption, also in seriously ill patients, must have been demonstrated. Other aspects that influence the cost of therapy are hospital stay and the possibility of outpatient treatment.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross InfectionHealth PolicyHumansLength of StayMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNetherlandsStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID9259029
OpenAlexW1545095364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.