ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology1997
Deliveries, abortion and HIV-1 infection in Rome, 1989-1994. The Lazio AIDS Collaborative Group.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- HIV testing in termination of pregnancy and colposcopy services: a scoping review.Sexually transmitted infections · 2022Article
- Bolstering the Evidence Base for Integrating Abortion and HIV Care: A Literature Review.AIDS research and treatment · 2012Article
- Newly diagnosed HIV infections among pregnant women and their partners.European journal of epidemiology · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of HIV-1 among women of reproductive age is currently estimated at the time they give birth. We assessed HIV-1 prevalence at the end of pregnancy, whether they delivered or had an induced or spontaneous abortion. Women admitted at the end of pregnancy to hospitals in the Lazio Region, Italy, were tested for antibodies to HIV-1. Consent for testing was granted by 97.1% of 218,357 subjects; women who did not consent were tested anonymously. The prevalences of infection were 0.34% in 1989, 0.38% in 1990, 0.28% in 1991, 0.23% in 1992, 0.28% in 1993, and 0.24% in 1994. Significantly higher prevalences of infection were associated with induced abortion (0.49%) than with delivery (0.18%; OR: 2.72; 95% CI: 2.29-3.22) and among women who refused (0.85%) than among those who consented to testing (0.27%; OR: 3.14; 95% CI: 2.35-4.19). A significant temporal reduction in prevalence was observed only among women who delivered (0.15% in 1993 and 1994; 0.26% in 1989 and 1990). The prevalence of HIV-1 infection is thus higher among women undergoing induced abortions than among those who deliver and higher among women who refuse testing than among those who consent. Studies confined to neonatal testing or to voluntary testing of pregnant women would thus underestimate the prevalence of HIV-1 among women of reproductive age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.