Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9254690›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience1997

Granule cell activation of complex-spiking neurons in dorsal cochlear nucleus.

K A Davis, E D Young

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eric Daniel Young.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Article
  2. The role of GABAFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spontaneous Activity Defines Effective Convergence Ratios in an Inhibitory Circuit.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K A DavisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Hearing Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
E D Young
Johns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

VESTIBULAR REFLEX ADAPTATION--PHYSICAL REHABILITATION/SURGICAL INTERVENTIONSP60DC000979 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MANIS, PAUL B · 1990 to 1999
–
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-00979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) principal cells receive, in addition to their well known auditory inputs, various nonauditory inputs via a cerebellar-like granule cell circuit located in the superficial layers of the DCN. Activation of this circuit (granule cell axons make excitatory synapses on the principal cells but also contact inhibitory interneurons that project to the principal cells) produces strong inhibition of the principal cells. Here we investigate the role of cartwheel cells, homologs of cerebellar Purkinje cells, in producing this inhibition. The responses of type IV units (one type of principal cells) and of cartwheel cells were recorded to ortho- and antidromic activation of the granule cells (i. e., by stimulation of their inputs from the somatosensory cuneate and spinal trigeminal nuclei and by direct stimulation of their parallel fiber axons). Cartwheel cells were identified on the basis of recording depth and complex action potential shape. A four-pulse facilitation paradigm (four pulses at 50 msec intervals) was used; this stimulus allows separation of the apparently simple inhibitory somatosensory response of type IV units into a three-component (inhibition-excitation-inhibition) response. As expected, cartwheel cells are excited by granule cell activation; the latencies and four-pulse amplitudes of these responses correspond to the properties of the second, long-latency inhibitory component of type IV responses. The source of the first, short-latency inhibitory response is still unknown. Nevertheless, these results show that cartwheel cells convey inhibitory polysensory information to DCN principal cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatsCochlear NucleusElectric StimulationElectrophysiologyMaleNeural InhibitionNeuronsReaction TimeSpinal CordTrigeminal Nucleus, Spinal

Identifiers

PMID9254690
PMCPMC6573148
OpenAlexW1486460857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.