Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9251810›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1997

Mechanical components of motor enzyme function.

C J Brokaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C J BrokawDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena 91125, USA. brokawc@cco.caltech.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor enzymes use energy from ATP dephosphorylation to generate movement by a mechanical cycle, moving and pushing in one direction while attached to their cytoskeletal substrate, and recovering by moving relative to their substrate to a new attachment site. Mainstream models assert that movement while attached to the substrate results from preexisting strain in the attached motor. The additional underlying ideas can be described in terms of three components for strain amplification: a rotating lever arm, multiple attached states, and elastic compliance. These components determine how energy is recovered during the mechanical cycle and stored in a strained motor. They may coexist in a real motor; the challenge is to determine the contributions of each component. Because these components can generate similar relationships between strain energy and strain, standard measurements of motor function do not discriminate easily between these components. However, important information could be is provided by observations that suggest weak coupling between chemical and mechanical cycles, observations of negative force and movement events in single motor experiments, and the discovery that two motors that move in opposite directions have very similar structures. In models incorporating changes in conformation between attached states, these observations are only explained easily if the conformational changes are tightly coupled to changes in the strength of motor-substrate binding.

Indexed as

ActinsAdenosine TriphosphateBinding SitesContractile ProteinsCytoskeletonDyneinsElasticityKinesinsMicrotubulesModels, ChemicalMyosinsStress, MechanicalActinsAdenosine TriphosphateContractile ProteinsDyneinsKinesinsMyosins

Identifiers

PMID9251810
PMCPMC1180990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.