ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology1997
Evaluation of luciferase reporter bacteriophage A511::luxAB for detection of Listeria monocytogenes in contaminated foods.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generating STEC-SpecificViruses · 2025Article
- Bacteriophage-based bioassays: an expected paradigm shift in microbial diagnostics.Future microbiology · 2024Review
- Luminescent Phage-Based Detection ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Application of Engineered Bacteriophage T7 in the Detection of Bacteria in Food Matrices.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- The Application of Bacteriophage Diagnostics for Bacterial Pathogens in the Agricultural Supply Chain: From Farm-to-Fork.PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- Non-Destructive Luminescence-Based Screening Tool forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Accurate and sensitive detection of Salmonella in foods by engineered bacteriophages.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A sandwich-type bacteriophage-based amperometric biosensor for the detection of Shiga toxin-producingRSC advances · 2020Article
- Glycotyping and Specific Separation of Listeria monocytogenes with a Novel Bacteriophage Protein Tool Kit.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Engineered Reporter Phages for Rapid Bioluminescence-Based Detection and Differentiation of ViableApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Rapid detection of Escherichia coli in beverages using genetically engineered bacteriophage T7.AMB Express · 2019Article
- Ultrasensitive and Fast Diagnostics of ViableViruses · 2018Article
- Phage-Based Applications in Synthetic Biology.Annual review of virology · 2018Review
- Engineering of Bacteriophages Y2::Applied and environmental microbiology · 2017Article
- Genetically Engineered Phages: a Review of Advances over the Last Decade.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016Review
- Biocontrol and Rapid Detection of Food-Borne Pathogens Using Bacteriophages and Endolysins.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Review
- Rapid Detection of Listeria by Bacteriophage Amplification and SERS-Lateral Flow Immunochromatography.Viruses · 2015Article
- Article
- Prevention of bacterial foodborne disease using nanobiotechnology.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A511::luxAB is a recombinant derivative of a broad-host-range bacteriophage specific for the genus Listeria, transducing bacterial bioluminescence into infected cells. In this study, we have evaluated its use for rapid and easy testing of contaminated foods and environmental samples for the presence of viable Listeria cells, in comparison to the standard plating procedure. With a short preenrichment step of 20 h, the system was capable of detecting very low initial contamination rates in several foods artificially contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes Scott A cells. In ricotta cheese, chocolate pudding, and cabbage, less than one cell per g of food could be clearly identified by comparing the light emission of phage-infected samples to that of controls without lux phage. In foods having a large and complex microbial background flora, such as minced meat and soft cheese, at least 10 cells per g were necessary to produce a positive bioluminescence signal. Of 348 potentially contaminated natural food and environmental samples, 55 were found to be Listeria positive by the lux phage method. The standard plating procedure detected 57 positive samples. Some differences were observed with respect to the individual samples, i.e., the lux phage procedure detected more positive samples among the dairy products and environmental samples, whereas the plating procedure revealed more contaminated meat and poultry samples. Overall, both methods performed similarly, i.e., were equally sensitive. However, the minimum time required for detection of Listeria with the luciferase phage assay was 24 h, which is much shorter than the 4 days needed by the standard plating method. Furthermore, a most probable number technique with three parallels, based on the use of A511::luxAB for differentiation of positive and negative tubes, is described. The method enables rapid enumeration of low levels of Listeria cells in several foods tested, against the background of a competing microflora.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.