ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1997
Simultaneous, multilocus FISH analysis for detection of microdeletions in the diagnostic evaluation of developmental delay and mental retardation.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns.Genome medicine · 2012Review
- Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to clinical diagnostics.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2006Review
- Multilocus FISH analysis.American journal of human genetics · 1997Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many microdeletion and contiguous gene-deletion syndromes include mental retardation as a clinical feature. We have developed MultiFISH, a FISH assay using several probes to simultaneously screen for multiple microdeletion syndromes in patients who present with unexplained devleopmental delay and/or mental retardation. This screening tool can be used to determine whether a particular microdeletion syndrome is involved in the etiology of these clinical phenotypes. In this pilot study we combined probes for the commonly deleted regions of Prader-Willi, Angelman, Williams, Smith-Magenis, and DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndromes in a single hybridization. The probes were differentially labeled, allowing multicolor detection, and 200 individual samples were screened in a blinded fashion. For all patients found by MultiFISH to have deletions, the deletions were originally identified and/or later confirmed by use of single-probe FISH analysis in our diagnostic cytogenetics laboratory. One patient, who was referred for developmental delay and was shown to have a normal G-banded karyotype, was identified by MultiFISH as having a micro-deletion at the DiGeorge/velocardiofacial commonly deleted region. Forty-six of the 200 total samples were tested for microdeletions by use of single FISH probes in the diagnostic laboratory. Ten of these cases were found to have deletions, and all deletions were subsequently detected by use of MultiFISH screen performed in a blinded fashion. Additionally, for all 200 patients tested by use of MultiFISH, no false-positive deletion results were observed. We demonstrate the ability of this technique to scan for and to identify microdeletions in a proportion of patients whose routine karyotype appears normal yet who are mentally retarded and/or developmentally delayed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.