ReviewDrug safety1997
Switching between cyclosporin formulations. What are the risks?
Review in Drug safety, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of cyclosporin, refinement in surgical techniques and improvement in allograft preservation have all led to an improvement in graft and ultimately patient survival. Cyclosporin is a lipophilic cyclic polypeptide produced by Trichoderma, a fungus isolated from Norwegian soil. Cyclosporin is a potent, selective and powerful immunosuppressive agent possessing a narrow therapeutic window. Substitution among different formulations of cyclosporin for economic reasons, without close monitoring of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, can induce undesirable toxic effects. A number of recent reports, largely anecdotal, of adverse drug reactions and acute cellular rejection after conversion from the standard formulation to the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin have created uncertainty over the therapeutic equivalency of these agents. This leading article reviews the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and adverse drug reactions of cyclosporin as well as the potential risks associated with switching between cyclosporin formulations in stable renal transplant recipients. Caution should be employed when switching between cyclosporin formulations. Since data are limited, long-term prospective studies are necessary to delineate the role of high peak concentrations obtained from the microemulsion formulation in relation to cyclosporin-induced chronic nephropathy. The significance of the reduction in pharmacokinetic variability with use of the microemulsion formulation in terms of graft and patient survival remains unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.