Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9241491›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1997

Switching between cyclosporin formulations. What are the risks?

A J Olyaei, A M deMattos, W M Bennett

Abstract readCase ReportsComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A J OlyaeiDivision of Nephrology, Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.
A M deMattos
W M Bennett
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of cyclosporin, refinement in surgical techniques and improvement in allograft preservation have all led to an improvement in graft and ultimately patient survival. Cyclosporin is a lipophilic cyclic polypeptide produced by Trichoderma, a fungus isolated from Norwegian soil. Cyclosporin is a potent, selective and powerful immunosuppressive agent possessing a narrow therapeutic window. Substitution among different formulations of cyclosporin for economic reasons, without close monitoring of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, can induce undesirable toxic effects. A number of recent reports, largely anecdotal, of adverse drug reactions and acute cellular rejection after conversion from the standard formulation to the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin have created uncertainty over the therapeutic equivalency of these agents. This leading article reviews the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and adverse drug reactions of cyclosporin as well as the potential risks associated with switching between cyclosporin formulations in stable renal transplant recipients. Caution should be employed when switching between cyclosporin formulations. Since data are limited, long-term prospective studies are necessary to delineate the role of high peak concentrations obtained from the microemulsion formulation in relation to cyclosporin-induced chronic nephropathy. The significance of the reduction in pharmacokinetic variability with use of the microemulsion formulation in terms of graft and patient survival remains unclear.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentAdolescentCyclosporineCyclosporinsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedCyclosporineCyclosporinsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID9241491
OpenAlexW2023107074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.