Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9238053›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1997

Ubiquitous, heritable damage in cell populations that survive treatment with methotrexate.

M Chow, H Rubin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M ChowDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology and Virus Laboratory, 229 Stanley Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3206, USA.
H Rubin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A permanent line of mouse embryo fibroblasts was treated with concentrations of the anticancer drug methotrexate (MTX) that left 20-50% surviving colonies. The surviving population initially multiplied at a much slower rate than controls after subculture in the absence of the drug, and required 9-12 days of serial subculture, with selective growth of the faster growing cells, to approximate the control rate. To determine the distribution of growth rates of cells in the original posttreatment populations, many single cells were isolated in multiwell plates immediately after the treatment period, and the resulting clones were serially subcultured. Most of the control clones underwent about 2 population doublings per day (PD/D). Almost all the survivors of MTX treatment multiplied at heterogeneously reduced rates, ranging from 0.6 PD/D to as high as control rates for a very few clones. They maintained the reduced rates through many subcultivations. The heritability of the reduced growth rates indicates that most cells that retain proliferative capacity after treatment with MTX carry random genetic damage that is perpetuated through many divisions of their progeny. Similar results have been described for cells that survive x-irradiation, and suggest random genetic damage is a common occurrence among cells in rapidly growing tissues that survive cytotoxic treatment. It also occurs in serial subcultures of cells that had been held under the constraint of confluence for extended periods, which suggests that the accumulation of random genetic damage to somatic cells during aging of mammals underlies the reduction of growth rate and function of the cells that characterizes the aging process.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCell DivisionCell LineCell SurvivalDNA DamageFemaleFibroblastsMethotrexateMicePregnancyAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID9238053
PMCPMC23124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.