ArticleThe Journal of physiology1997
Gating of cutaneous input to cerebellar climbing fibres during a reaching task in the cat.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rigidity in Parkinson's Disease: The Objective Effect of Levodopa.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Neuronal activity patterns in microcircuits of the cerebellar cortical C3 zone during reaching.The Journal of physiology · 2022Article
- Sensory and motor electrophysiological mapping of the cerebellum in humans.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Pre-movement changes in sensorimotor beta oscillations predict motor adaptation drive.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Consensus paper: Decoding the Contributions of the Cerebellum as a Time Machine. From Neurons to Clinical Applications.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2019Article
- Article
- Transmission of Predictable Sensory Signals to the Cerebellum via Climbing Fiber Pathways Is Gated during Exploratory Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
- Redefining the cerebellar cortex as an assembly of non-uniform Purkinje cell microcircuits.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2015Review
- Spino-olivary projections in the rat are anatomically separate from postsynaptic dorsal column projections.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2014Article
- In vivo analysis of inhibitory synaptic inputs and rebounds in deep cerebellar nuclear neurons.PloS one · 2011Article
- Representation of movement velocity in the rat's interpositus nucleus during passive forelimb movements.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2010Article
- Climbing fiber coupling between adjacent purkinje cell dendrites in vivo.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2009Article
- Role of the olivo-cerebellar system in timing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2006Article
- Changes in excitability of ascending and descending inputs to cerebellar climbing fibers during locomotion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2004Article
- Central regulation of cerebellar climbing fibre input during motor learning.The Journal of physiology · 2002Article
- Gating of transmission in climbing fibre paths to cerebellar cortical C1 and C3 zones in the rostral paramedian lobule during locomotion in the cat.The Journal of physiology · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
1. Task-dependent modulation of cutaneous input to climbing fibres projecting to the C1, C2 and C3 zones in the cerebellar paravermal lobule V was investigated in awake cats during performance of a reaching task. 2. Climbing fibre responses resulting from low intensity (non-noxious) electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral superficial radial nerve were recorded as extracellular field potentials in the cerebellar cortex using chronically implanted microwires. 3. Response size, measured as the time-voltage integral of the evoked field potential, was assessed during three phases of the reaching movement, reaction, reach and grasp, and compared with the response size at rest. 4. At C1 and C3 zone recording sites response size was usually reduced during the task (7/10 sites). The reduction was most pronounced in the grasp phase, occasionally accompanied by a smaller reduction in the reach and reaction phases. In one case an enhancement was found in the reach phase. 5. Response size was also modulated during the task at four of six C2 zone recording sites. However, the results were mixed. In three cases the modulation resembled the pattern at C1/C3 sites with the responses being reduced in the grasp phase accompanied on occasion by a lesser reduction in the reach phase. In the remaining case there was an enhancement during grasp. In this case and one other there was also an enhancement during the reaction phase. 6. The findings indicate significant gating of cutaneous input to climbing fibres projecting to the C1, C2 and C3 zones during reaching movements, while the variability between recording sites suggests functional differences, both between and within zones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.