ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)1997
Classical multidrug resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine with or without valspodar in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a phase III trial (E2995).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2004Trial
- The interleukin-3 receptor alpha chain is a unique marker for human acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells.Leukemia · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 15-30% of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients are primarily resistant to chemotherapy, and 60-80% of patients who achieve complete remission will inevitably relapse and succumb to their disease. The multidrug resistant (MDR) phenotype has been suspected as a major mechanism of therapy failure in AML; it is one of the best understood mechanisms of resistance to anticancer drugs. The classical MDR phenotype is characterized by the reduced ability of cells to accumulate drugs as compared to normal cells. The increased drug efflux is due to the activity of a 170 kDa glycoprotein, the P-glycoprotein (Pgp), a unidirectional drug-efflux pump which is encoded by the MDR1 gene. While studies of myeloid leukaemia and myeloma have provided the best evidence for the potential association between Pgp expression and clinical outcome, the lack of standardized methods for MDR detection and perhaps even more importantly, inconsistencies in the interpretation of MDR expression data account for divergent results in the literature. The clinicians' strong interest in MDR stems from the availability of agents capable of interfering with MDR, at least in vitro. If these laboratory results were reproducible in vivo, reversal of MDR would offer a rare opportunity to incorporate laboratory experience into the clinical management of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9232613What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.