Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9231468›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1997

Determining priorities for change in primary care: the value of practice-based needs assessment.

D A Ruta, M C Duffy, A Farquharson, A M Young, F B Gilmour, S P McElduff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Journey toward change: a family practice's experience with program development.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A pharmaceutical needs assessment in a primary care setting.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
  4. Needs assessment in primary care: general practitioners' perceptions and implications for the future.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Making sense of health needs assessment.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D A RutaTayside Health Board, Dundee, Alyth Health Centre, Perthshire.
M C Duffy
A Farquharson
A M Young
F B Gilmour
S P McElduff

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care is being expected to expand the range of services it provides, and to take on many of the tasks traditionally provided in secondary care. At the same time, general practitioners (GPs) will become increasingly responsible for assessing their patients' health care needs and commissioning care from other providers. This article describes an approach taken in one general practice to meet these difficult challenges.

aimTo examine whether information on health and health care needs, when used as the basis for a priority setting exercise, can provide a useful first step in planning primary care provision within a practice.

methodA three-stage process of information-gathering from a number of sources, including continuous data recording of patient contacts and a postal survey of all adults registered with the practice, identification of key findings and discussion of associated issues, and priority setting of proposals for practice development using the nominal group technique.

resultsContinuous data recording of patient contacts with GPs and the practice nurse provided data on 4489 GP contacts with 2027 patients, 1000 district nurse contacts with 101 patients, and 361 health visitor contacts with 172 clients. More than 70% of patient records had been computerized, with 600 diagnostic READ codes identified and 11,500 separate entries made. The socioeconomic and health survey questionnaire achieved an 84% response rate. Following the priority-setting exercise, 28 proposed practice developments were identified. These were reduced to a final list of eight.

conclusionA comprehensive method of practice-based needs assessment, when used as the basis for some form of priority setting, has great potential in helping to plan primary care services within a practice. The success of such initiatives will require a substantial investment of resources in primary care and fundamental changes to the way in which primary care is funded.

Indexed as

Health PrioritiesHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInformation SystemsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID9231468
PMCPMC1313025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.